Difference between revisions of "Mock AIME 6 2006-2007 Problems/Problem 7"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
But to get how many more '''distinct''' complex roots, we must subtract the complex roots of <math>P_{1004}</math> that can be found in <math>Q_{1003}</math> | But to get how many more '''distinct''' complex roots, we must subtract the complex roots of <math>P_{1004}</math> that can be found in <math>Q_{1003}</math> | ||
− | complex roots of <math>P_{1004}:\; x=e^{\frac{1}{1005}2\pi i},e^{\frac{2}{1005}2\pi i},e^{\frac{3}{1005}2\pi i},\cdots,e^{\frac{1004}{1005}2\pi i}</math> for a total of <math>1004</math> complex roots. | + | complex roots of <math>P_{1004}:\; x=e^{\frac{1}{1005}2\pi i},e^{\frac{2}{1005}2\pi i},e^{\frac{3}{1005}2\pi i},\cdots,e^{\frac{1004}{1005}2\pi i}</math> for a total of <math>\textbf{1004}</math> complex roots. |
Now we subtract the common complex roots of <math>P_{1004}</math> with <math>Q_{1003}</math> by finding how many reducible fractions are there in <math>\frac{k}{1005}</math> for <math>k=1,2,\cdots,1005</math> | Now we subtract the common complex roots of <math>P_{1004}</math> with <math>Q_{1003}</math> by finding how many reducible fractions are there in <math>\frac{k}{1005}</math> for <math>k=1,2,\cdots,1005</math> | ||
+ | Since <math>1005=(3)(5)(67)</math> then <math>\frac{k}{1005}</math> is reducible when <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;3)</math> or <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;5)</math> or <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;67)</math> | ||
+ | <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;3):</math> | ||
+ | <math>3, 6, 9, 12, 15,\cdots, 1002</math> gives '''334''' terms | ||
+ | <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;5):</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>5, 10, 15, 20, 25,\cdots, 1000</math> gives '''200''' terms | ||
+ | |||
+ | But we subtract the repeated terms in the 5 sequence that are also a multiple of 3: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>15, 30,\cdots,990</math> which is '''66''' terms | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>k \equiv 0\;(mod\;67):</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>67, 134, 201,\cdots, 928</math> gives '''14''' terms | ||
+ | |||
+ | But we subtract the repeated terms in the 67 sequence that are also a multiple of 3 or 5: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>201, 402, 603, 804</math> and <math>335, 670</math> gives '''6''' terms. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total terms to subtract: <math>334+200-66+14-6=\textbf{476}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, the number of distinct complex that <math>Q_{1004}</math> have more than <math>Q_{1003}</math> is: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>1004-476=\boxed{528}</math> distinct complex roots that <math>Q_{1004}</math> have more than <math>Q_{1003}</math> | ||
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com | ~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} |
Latest revision as of 20:51, 26 November 2023
Problem
Let and
for all integers
. How many more distinct complex roots does
have than
?
Solution
The roots of will be in the form
for
with the only real solution when
is odd and
and the rest are complex.
Therefore, each will have
distinct complex roots when
is even and
distinct complex roots when
is odd.
The roots of will be all of the roots of
which will include several repeated roots.
To get how many more complex roots does have than
that will be the number of complex roots of
.
But to get how many more distinct complex roots, we must subtract the complex roots of that can be found in
complex roots of for a total of
complex roots.
Now we subtract the common complex roots of with
by finding how many reducible fractions are there in
for
Since then
is reducible when
or
or
gives 334 terms
gives 200 terms
But we subtract the repeated terms in the 5 sequence that are also a multiple of 3:
which is 66 terms
gives 14 terms
But we subtract the repeated terms in the 67 sequence that are also a multiple of 3 or 5:
and
gives 6 terms.
Total terms to subtract:
Therefore, the number of distinct complex that have more than
is:
distinct complex roots that
have more than
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.