Difference between revisions of "SANSKAR'S OG PROBLEMS"
m |
m (fixed error and deleted feedback) |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
To simplify future calculations, note that | To simplify future calculations, note that | ||
| − | <cmath>a!=\overline{ab}^2-b!=(10a+1)^2-1=100a^2+20a=10a( | + | <cmath>a!=\overline{ab}^2-b!=(10a+1)^2-1=100a^2+20a=10a(10a+2)</cmath>. |
For <math>a=5</math>, this does not hold. | For <math>a=5</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
For <math>a=6</math>, this does not hold. | For <math>a=6</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| − | For <math>a=7</math>, this does | + | For <math>a=7</math>, this does hold. Hence, <math>(a,b)=(7,1)</math> is a solution. |
For <math>a=8</math>, this does not hold. | For <math>a=8</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | ||
| − | We see | + | We see that <math>(a,b)=(7,1) \implies a+b=\boxed{008}</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> ~[[Ddk001]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Problem2 == | ==Problem2 == | ||
For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. | For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 3 February 2024
Hi, this page is created by ...~ SANSGANKRSNGUPTA This page contains exclusive problems made by me myself. I am the creator of these OG problems. What OG stands for is a secret! Please post your solutions with your name. If you view this page please increment the below number by one:
Problem 1
Let
be a 2-digit positive integer satisfying
. Find
.
Solution 1 (Casework)
Case 1:
In this case, we have
.
If
, we must have
, but this contradicts the original assumption of
, so hence we must have
.
With this in mind, we consider the unit digit of
.
Subcase 1.1:
In this case, we have that
.
There is no apparent contradiction here, so we leave this as it is.
Subcase 1.2:
In this case, we have that
.
This contradicts with the fact that
, so this is impossible.
Subcase 1.3:
In this case, we have that
.
However, this is impossible for all
.
Subcase 1.4:
In this case, we have that
.
Again, this yields
, which, again, contradicts
.
Hence, we must have
.
Now, with
determined by modular arithmetic, we actually plug in the values.
To simplify future calculations, note that
.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does hold. Hence,
is a solution.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
Hence, there is no positive integers
and
between
and
inclusive such that
.
Case 2:
For this case, we must have
which is impossible if a is a integer and
.
Case 3:
In this case, we have
.
If
, we must have
which is impossible since
and
.
Hence,
.
Subcase 3.1:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such
.
Subcase 3.2:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such
.
Subcase 3.3:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such
.
Subcase 3.4:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such
.
We see that
.
~Ddk001
Problem2
For any positive integer
,
>1 can
be a perfect square? If yes, give one such
. If no, then prove it.