Difference between revisions of "Polynomial Remainder Theorem"

m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[algebra]], the '''Polynomial Remainder Theorem''' states that the remainder upon [[Synthetic division | dividing]] any [[polynomial]] <math>P(x)</math> by a linear polynomial <math>x-a</math>, both with [[Complex number | complex]] coefficients, is equal to <math>P(a)</math>.
+
In [[algebra]], the '''Polynomial Remainder Theorem''' states that the remainder upon [[Synthetic division | dividing]] any [[polynomial]] <math>P(x)</math> by a linear polynomial <math>x-a</math>, both with [[Complex number|complex]] coefficients, is equal to <math>P(a)</math>.
  
 
== Proof ==
 
== Proof ==
We use Euclidean polynomial division with dividend <math>P(x)</math> and divisor <math>x-a</math>. The result states that there exists a quotient <math>Q(x)</math> and remainder <math>R(x)</math> such that <cmath>P(x) = (x-a) Q(x) + R(x),</cmath> with <math>\deg R(x) < \deg (x-a)</math>. We wish to show that <math>R(x)</math> is equal to the constant <math>f(a)</math>. Because <math>\deg (x-a) = 1</math>, <math>\deg R(x) < 1</math>. Hence, <math>R(x)</math> is a constant, <math>r</math>. Plugging this into our original equation and rearranging a bit yields <cmath>r = P(x) - (x-a) Q(x).</cmath> After substituting <math>x=a</math> into this equation, we deduce that <math>r = P(a)</math>; thus, the remainder upon diving <math>P(x)</math> by <math>x-a</math> is equal to <math>P(a)</math>, as desired. <math>\square</math>
+
By polynomial division with dividend <math>P(x)</math> and divisor <math>x-a</math>, that exist a quotient <math>Q(x)</math> and remainder <math>R(x)</math> such that <cmath>P(x) = (x-a) Q(x) + R(x)</cmath> with <math>\deg R(x) < \deg (x-a)</math>. We wish to show that <math>R(x)</math> is equal to the constant <math>P(a)</math>. Because <math>\deg (x-a) = 1</math>, <math>\deg R(x) < 1</math>. Therefore, <math>\deg R(x) = 0</math>, and so the <math>R(x)</math> is a constant.
 +
 
 +
Let this constant be <math>r</math>. We may substitute this into our original equation and rearrange to yield <cmath>r = P(x) - (x-a) Q(x).</cmath> When <math>x = a</math>, this equation becomes <math>r = P(a)</math>. Hence, the remainder upon diving <math>P(x)</math> by <math>x-a</math> is equal to <math>P(a)</math>. <math>\square</math>
  
 
== Generalization ==
 
== Generalization ==
 
The strategy used in the above proof can be generalized to divisors with degree greater than <math>1</math>. A more general method, with any dividend <math>P(x)</math> and divisor <math>D(x)</math>, is to write <math>R(x) = D(x) Q(x) - P(x)</math>, and then substitute the zeroes of <math>D(x)</math> to eliminate <math>Q(x)</math> and find values of <math>R(x)</math>. Example 2 showcases this strategy.
 
The strategy used in the above proof can be generalized to divisors with degree greater than <math>1</math>. A more general method, with any dividend <math>P(x)</math> and divisor <math>D(x)</math>, is to write <math>R(x) = D(x) Q(x) - P(x)</math>, and then substitute the zeroes of <math>D(x)</math> to eliminate <math>Q(x)</math> and find values of <math>R(x)</math>. Example 2 showcases this strategy.
  
== Examples==
+
== Problems==
 
Here are some problems with solutions that utilize the Polynomial Remainder Theorem and its generalization.
 
Here are some problems with solutions that utilize the Polynomial Remainder Theorem and its generalization.
  
Line 15: Line 17:
 
'''Solution''': Although one could use long or synthetic division, the Polynomial Remainder Theorem provides a significantly shorter solution. Note that <math>P(x) = x^2 + 2x + 3</math>, and <math>x-a = x+1</math>. A common mistake is to forget to flip the negative sign and assume <math>a = 1</math>, but simplifying the linear equation yields <math>a = -1</math>. Thus, the answer is <math>P(-1)</math>, or <math>(-1)^2 + 2(-1) + 3</math>, which is equal to <math>2</math>. <math>\square</math>.  
 
'''Solution''': Although one could use long or synthetic division, the Polynomial Remainder Theorem provides a significantly shorter solution. Note that <math>P(x) = x^2 + 2x + 3</math>, and <math>x-a = x+1</math>. A common mistake is to forget to flip the negative sign and assume <math>a = 1</math>, but simplifying the linear equation yields <math>a = -1</math>. Thus, the answer is <math>P(-1)</math>, or <math>(-1)^2 + 2(-1) + 3</math>, which is equal to <math>2</math>. <math>\square</math>.  
  
=== More examples ===
+
=== More Problems ===
* [[1950 AHSME Problems/Problem 20 | 1950 ASHME Problem 20]]
+
* [[1950 AHSME Problems/Problem 20|1950 AHSME Problem 20]]
* [[1961 AHSME Problems/Problem 22 | 1961 ASHME Problem 22]]
+
* [[1961 AHSME Problems/Problem 22|1961 AHSME Problem 22]]
* [[1969 AHSME Problems/Problem 34 | 1969 ASHME Problem 34]]
+
* [[1969 AHSME Problems/Problem 34|1969 AHSME Problem 34]]
  
== See also ==
+
== See Also ==
 
* [[Polynomial]]
 
* [[Polynomial]]
 
* [[Factor theorem]]
 
* [[Factor theorem]]
  
[[Category:Algebra]] [[Category:Polynomials]] [[Category:Theorems]]
+
[[Category:Algebra]]
 +
[[Category:Polynomials]]
 +
[[Category:Theorems]]
 +
{{stub}}

Latest revision as of 13:00, 11 March 2025

In algebra, the Polynomial Remainder Theorem states that the remainder upon dividing any polynomial $P(x)$ by a linear polynomial $x-a$, both with complex coefficients, is equal to $P(a)$.

Proof

By polynomial division with dividend $P(x)$ and divisor $x-a$, that exist a quotient $Q(x)$ and remainder $R(x)$ such that \[P(x) = (x-a) Q(x) + R(x)\] with $\deg R(x) < \deg (x-a)$. We wish to show that $R(x)$ is equal to the constant $P(a)$. Because $\deg (x-a) = 1$, $\deg R(x) < 1$. Therefore, $\deg R(x) = 0$, and so the $R(x)$ is a constant.

Let this constant be $r$. We may substitute this into our original equation and rearrange to yield \[r = P(x) - (x-a) Q(x).\] When $x = a$, this equation becomes $r = P(a)$. Hence, the remainder upon diving $P(x)$ by $x-a$ is equal to $P(a)$. $\square$

Generalization

The strategy used in the above proof can be generalized to divisors with degree greater than $1$. A more general method, with any dividend $P(x)$ and divisor $D(x)$, is to write $R(x) = D(x) Q(x) - P(x)$, and then substitute the zeroes of $D(x)$ to eliminate $Q(x)$ and find values of $R(x)$. Example 2 showcases this strategy.

Problems

Here are some problems with solutions that utilize the Polynomial Remainder Theorem and its generalization.

Example 1

What is the remainder when $x^2+2x+3$ is divided by $x+1$?

Solution: Although one could use long or synthetic division, the Polynomial Remainder Theorem provides a significantly shorter solution. Note that $P(x) = x^2 + 2x + 3$, and $x-a = x+1$. A common mistake is to forget to flip the negative sign and assume $a = 1$, but simplifying the linear equation yields $a = -1$. Thus, the answer is $P(-1)$, or $(-1)^2 + 2(-1) + 3$, which is equal to $2$. $\square$.

More Problems

See Also

This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.