Difference between revisions of "1972 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
(x_4^2 - x_1x_3)(x_5^2 - x_1x_3) \leq 0 \\ | (x_4^2 - x_1x_3)(x_5^2 - x_1x_3) \leq 0 \\ | ||
(x_5^2 - x_2x_4)(x_1^2 - x_2x_4) \leq 0 | (x_5^2 - x_2x_4)(x_1^2 - x_2x_4) \leq 0 | ||
− | \end{align*}</cmath> | + | \end{align*} |
+ | </cmath> | ||
where <math>x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5</math> are positive real numbers. | where <math>x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5</math> are positive real numbers. | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
Borrowed from [http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln724.html] | Borrowed from [http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln724.html] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This solution is longer and less elegant than the previous one, | ||
+ | but it is more direct, and based on a different idea, so it is | ||
+ | worth mentioning. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Looking at the first inequality as an example, we can see that | ||
+ | we have either | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>(x_1^2 - x_3x_5) \le 0</math> and <math>(x_2^2 - x_3x_5) \ge 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | or | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>(x_1^2 - x_3x_5) \ge 0</math> and <math>(x_2^2 - x_3x_5) \le 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We have a similar conclusion from the other four inequalities. | ||
+ | So, we have to look at three cases: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. all five first factors are <math>\le 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. four first factors are <math>\le 0</math> and one is <math>\ge 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. three first factors are <math>\le 0</math> and two are <math>\ge 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The other three cases are equivalent to these. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the first case, we have | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | (x_1^2 - x_3x_5) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (1l) \hspace{40pt} (x_2^2 - x_3x_5) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (1r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_2^2 - x_4x_1) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (2l) \hspace{40pt} (x_3^2 - x_4x_1) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (2r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_3^2 - x_5x_2) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (3l) \hspace{40pt} (x_4^2 - x_5x_2) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (3r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_4^2 - x_1x_3) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (4l) \hspace{40pt} (x_5^2 - x_1x_3) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (4r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_5^2 - x_2x_4) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (5l) \hspace{40pt} (x_1^2 - x_2x_4) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (5r) | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | (1l) and (1r) imply <math>x_1^2 \le x_2^2</math>, and we have four similar inequalities | ||
+ | from the other four rows. Putting them together, we obtain | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>x_1^2 \le x_2^2 \le x_3^2 \le x_4^2 \le x_5^2 \le x_1^2</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | which implies <math>x_1 = x_2 = x_3 = x_4 = x_5</math> (remember that <math>x_n</math> are positive). | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the second case, let us look at | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | (x_1^2 - x_3x_5) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (1l) \hspace{40pt} (x_2^2 - x_3x_5) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (1r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_2^2 - x_4x_1) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (2l) \hspace{40pt} (x_3^2 - x_4x_1) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (2r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_3^2 - x_5x_2) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (3l) \hspace{40pt} (x_4^2 - x_5x_2) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (3r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_4^2 - x_1x_3) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (4l) \hspace{40pt} (x_5^2 - x_1x_3) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (4r) \\ | ||
+ | (x_5^2 - x_2x_4) \le 0 \hspace{20pt} (5l) \hspace{40pt} (x_1^2 - x_2x_4) \ge 0 \hspace{20pt} (5r) | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This implies <math>x_2^2 \le x_3^2 \le x_4^2 \le x_5^2 \le x_1^2</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | TO BE CONTINUED. | ||
== See Also == {{IMO box|year=1972|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | == See Also == {{IMO box|year=1972|num-b=3|num-a=5}} |
Revision as of 20:56, 4 May 2025
Find all solutions of the system of inequalities
where
are positive real numbers.
Solution
Add the five inequalities together to get
Expanding, multiplying by , and re-combining terms, we get
Every term is , so every term must
.
From the first term, we can deduce that .
From the second term,
.
From the third term, . From the fourth term,
.
Therefore, is the only solution.
Borrowed from [1]
Solution 2
This solution is longer and less elegant than the previous one, but it is more direct, and based on a different idea, so it is worth mentioning.
Looking at the first inequality as an example, we can see that we have either
and
or
and
We have a similar conclusion from the other four inequalities. So, we have to look at three cases:
1. all five first factors are
2. four first factors are and one is
3. three first factors are and two are
The other three cases are equivalent to these.
In the first case, we have
(1l) and (1r) imply , and we have four similar inequalities
from the other four rows. Putting them together, we obtain
which implies (remember that
are positive).
For the second case, let us look at
This implies .
TO BE CONTINUED.
See Also
1972 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |