Difference between revisions of "1984 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Not detriti (talk | contribs) m (changed username) |
Not detriti (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Solution 2== | ==Solution 2== | ||
− | By the method of Lagrangian multipliers. Let <math>f(x,y,z) = xy + yz + zx - 2xyz</math> and <math>\phi(x,y,z) = x+y+z-1</math>. We will find the local maxima/minima of <math>f</math> over <math>S = \{(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : 0 \leq x,y,z \leq 1\}</math> subject to <math>\phi = 0</math>. | + | By the method of Lagrangian multipliers. Let <math>f(x,y,z) = xy + yz + zx - 2xyz</math> and <math>\phi(x,y,z) = x+y+z-1</math>. We will find the local maxima/minima of <math>f</math> over <math>S = \{(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : 0 \leq x,y,z \leq 1\}</math> subject to <math>\phi = 0</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>S' = S \cap \{(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : \phi(x,y,z) = 0\}</math>. <math>S'</math> is bounded and the intersection of two closed sets, hence compact. So every sequence in <math>S'</math> has a convergent subsequence. Hence if <math>(a_k)_k \subset S'</math> is such that <math>f(a_k)</math> converges to the infimum or supremum of <math>f</math> in <math>S'</math>, there will be a convergent subsequence <math>a_{k_j} \rightarrow a_\infty \in S'</math> and <math>f(a_\infty) = \lim_{j \rightarrow \infty}f(a_{k_j})</math> by the continuity of <math>f</math>. Hence the infimum/supremum of <math>f</math> over <math>S'</math> will also be a local minima/maxima of <math>f</math> over <math>S'</math>. | ||
We must solve <math>\nabla f - \lambda \nabla \phi = 0</math>. This is equivalent to | We must solve <math>\nabla f - \lambda \nabla \phi = 0</math>. This is equivalent to |
Latest revision as of 12:32, 10 July 2025
Problem
Let ,
,
be nonnegative real numbers with
. Show that
Solution 1
Note that this inequality is symmetric with x,y and z.
To prove note that
implies that at most one of
,
, or
is greater than
. Suppose
, WLOG. Then,
since
, implying all terms are positive.
To prove , suppose
. Note that
since at most one of x,y,z is
. Suppose not all of them equals
-otherwise, we would be done. This implies
and
. Thus, define
,
Then,
,
, and
. After some simplification,
since
and
. If we repeat the process, defining
after similar reasoning, we see that
.
Solution 2
By the method of Lagrangian multipliers. Let and
. We will find the local maxima/minima of
over
subject to
.
Let .
is bounded and the intersection of two closed sets, hence compact. So every sequence in
has a convergent subsequence. Hence if
is such that
converges to the infimum or supremum of
in
, there will be a convergent subsequence
and
by the continuity of
. Hence the infimum/supremum of
over
will also be a local minima/maxima of
over
.
We must solve . This is equivalent to
\begin{align}
x+y - 2xy &= -2uv + 1/2 = \lambda \\
y+z - 2yz &= -2vw + 1/2 = \lambda \\
z+x - 2zx &= -2wu + 1/2 = \lambda
\end{align}
where
. If
then
. WLOG
and we have
.
Then WLOG
. These imply
. Then
since
. We get
.
If then letting
one gets
which imply
since
. This implies
since
. And
.
Now to check the boundary of . WLOG we must consider the cases
and
. If
then
by
so
. If
substituting
in
yields
which is between
and
since
. Considering all the values found we find
.
~not_detriti
Video Solution
Video Solution
See Also
1984 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |