Difference between revisions of "1964 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
|||
(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<cmath>a^2(b+c-a)+b^2(c+a-b)+c^2(a+b-c)\le{3abc}.</cmath> | <cmath>a^2(b+c-a)+b^2(c+a-b)+c^2(a+b-c)\le{3abc}.</cmath> | ||
− | == Solution == | + | ==Solution== |
− | {{solution}} | + | Let <math>b+c-a = x</math>, <math>c+a-b = y</math>, and <math>a+b-c = z</math>. Then, <math>a = \frac{y+z}{2}</math>, <math>b = \frac{x+z}{2}</math>, and <math>c = \frac{x+y}{2}</math>. By AM-GM, |
+ | <cmath>\frac{x+y}{2} \geq \sqrt{xy}, </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{y+z}{2} \geq \sqrt{yz}, </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\textrm{and }\frac{x+z}{2} \geq \sqrt{xz}.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Multiplying these equations, we have | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{x+y}{2} \cdot \frac{y+z}{2} \cdot \frac{x+z}{2} \geq xyz</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\therefore abc \geq (a+b-c)(b+c-a)(c+a-b).</cmath> | ||
+ | We can now simplify: | ||
+ | <cmath>(a+b-c)(b+c-a)(c+a-b) \leq abc</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>(-a^2 + b^2 - c^2 + 2ac)(c+a-b) \leq abc</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>a(-a^2 + b^2 - c^2 + 2ac) + c(-a^2 + b^2 - c^2 + 2ac) - b(-a^2 + b^2 - c^2 + 2ac) \leq abc</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>-a^3 + ab^2 - ac^2 + 2a^2c - a^2c + b^2c - c^3 + 2ac^2 + a^2b - b^3 + bc^2 - 2abc \leq abc</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>a^2b + a^2c - a^3 + b^2c + ab^2 - b^3 + ac^2 + bc^2 - c^3 - 2abc \leq abc</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>a^2(b+c-a)+b^2(c+a-b)+c^2(a+b-c)\le{3abc}\textrm{. }\square</cmath> | ||
+ | ~mathboy100 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 2 (Ravi Substitution) == | ||
+ | We can use the substitution <math>a=x+y</math>, <math>b=x+z</math>, and <math>c=y+z</math> to get | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>2z(x+y)^2+2y(x+z)^2+2x(y+z)^2\leq 3(x+y)(x+z)(y+z)</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>2zx^2+2zy^2+2yx^2+2yz^2+2xy^2+2xz^2+12xyz\leq 3x^2y+3x^2z+3y^2x+3y^2z+3z^2x+3z^2y+6xyz</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>x^2y+x^2z+y^2x+y^2z+z^2x+z^2y\geq 6xyz</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{x^2y+x^2z+y^2x+y^2z+z^2x+z^2y}{6}\geq xyz=\sqrt[6]{x^2yx^2zy^2xy^2zz^2xz^2y}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is true by AM-GM. We can work backwards to get that the original inequality is true. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3== | ||
+ | Rearrange to get | ||
+ | <cmath>a(a-b)(a-c) + b(b-a)(b-c) + c(c-a)(c-b) \ge 0,</cmath> | ||
+ | which is true by Schur's inequality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 4== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The fact that <math>a, b, c</math> are the sides of a triangle doesn't do anything except telling you <math>b+c-a, c+a-b, a+b-c, a, b, c</math> are all positive numbers (by triangle inequality). Once we established this, the problem become an ordinary inequality problem that will potentially have many ways to solve. Here is one solution: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We aim to prove: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>a^2(b+c-a)+b^2(c+a-b)+c^2(a+b-c)\le{3abc} \Rightarrow a^3+b^3+c^3+3abc \geq a^2b+a^2c+b^2c+b^2a+c^2a+c^2b</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Here already we can finish the proof by Schur's inequality) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\Rightarrow a^3+b^3+c^3+6abc \geq (a+b+c)(ab+bc+ca)</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is homogeneous as both sides have the degree of 3. WLOG, we can thus let <math>a+b+c = 1</math>, then the <math>RHS = ab+bc+ca</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The <math>LHS = (a+b+c)(a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ca)+9abc = a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ca+9abc</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We need to prove <cmath>LHS \geq RHS \Rightarrow a^2+b^2+c^2-2ab-2bc-2ca+9abc = 1-4(ab+bc+ca)+9abc</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using Lagrange multiplier, let <math>f(x) = 1-4(ab+bc+ca)+9abc+\lambda(a+b+c-1)</math>, then we take the partial derivatives to obtain the four equations: | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{cases} | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial a} = -4(b+c)+9bc+\lambda = 0 | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial b} = -4(a+c)+9ac+\lambda = 0 | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial c} = -4(a+b)+9ab+\lambda = 0 | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda} = a+b+c-1 = 0 | ||
+ | \end{cases} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Solving the system, we obtained <math>a=b=c=\frac{1}{3}</math> or <math>a,b,c = \{5/18,5/18,4/9\}</math>. Checking the boundaries we can also obtain <math>a,b,c = \{0,1/2,1/2\}</math>, testing the values of <math>f(a,b,c)</math>, we find that <math>f(a,b,c) \geq 0</math>, and we are done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *We can verify that the interior stationary point <math>(1/3, 1/3, 1/3)</math> is indeed a minimum by hessian matrix | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~[[User:IDKHowtoaddsolution|IDKHowtoaddsolution]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Video Solution== | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/6gDLBT1aGQM?si=ZR78mdotq4wfS3SA&t=637 [little fermat] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See Also == {{IMO box|year=1964|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Latest revision as of 17:34, 4 September 2025
Contents
Problem
Suppose are the sides of a triangle. Prove that
Solution
Let ,
, and
. Then,
,
, and
. By AM-GM,
Multiplying these equations, we have
We can now simplify:
~mathboy100
Solution 2 (Ravi Substitution)
We can use the substitution ,
, and
to get
This is true by AM-GM. We can work backwards to get that the original inequality is true.
Solution 3
Rearrange to get
which is true by Schur's inequality.
Solution 4
The fact that are the sides of a triangle doesn't do anything except telling you
are all positive numbers (by triangle inequality). Once we established this, the problem become an ordinary inequality problem that will potentially have many ways to solve. Here is one solution:
We aim to prove:
(Here already we can finish the proof by Schur's inequality)
This is homogeneous as both sides have the degree of 3. WLOG, we can thus let , then the
.
The .
We need to prove
Using Lagrange multiplier, let , then we take the partial derivatives to obtain the four equations:
\begin{cases} \frac{\partial f}{\partial a} = -4(b+c)+9bc+\lambda = 0 \frac{\partial f}{\partial b} = -4(a+c)+9ac+\lambda = 0 \frac{\partial f}{\partial c} = -4(a+b)+9ab+\lambda = 0 \frac{\partial f}{\partial \lambda} = a+b+c-1 = 0 \end{cases}
Solving the system, we obtained or $a,b,c = \{5/18,5/18,4/9\}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg). Checking the boundaries we can also obtain $a,b,c = \{0,1/2,1/2\}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg), testing the values of
, we find that
, and we are done.
- We can verify that the interior stationary point
is indeed a minimum by hessian matrix
Video Solution
https://youtu.be/6gDLBT1aGQM?si=ZR78mdotq4wfS3SA&t=637 [little fermat]
See Also
1964 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |