Difference between revisions of "2019 Mock AMC 10B Problems/Problem 23"
(Created page with "To solve this problem, we can consider each unit of <math>1</math> to be separated into <math>n</math> equal increments. (For example, if each unit of <math>1</math> is separa...") |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thus, our answer is <math>16+81=\boxed{97}</math>. | Thus, our answer is <math>16+81=\boxed{97}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: This problem is probably way too hard to appear on an AMC 10 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Solution 2 (Fakesolve) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that the answer probably looks like <math>\frac{\textbf{something}}{81}</math>, and based on the answer choices, we can guess that <math>\frac{16}{81}</math> is the desired probability, as <math>16</math> is a power of <math>2</math> and <math>\frac{16}{81}=\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^{4}</math> |
Latest revision as of 16:56, 30 September 2025
To solve this problem, we can consider each unit of to be separated into
equal increments. (For example, if each unit of
is separated into
equal increments, there would be
tiny fragments of
per unit of
.) Recall that
, so we have to calculate (1) the number of ways to arrange
“blocks” of
in the whole “grid” of length
given
increments per unit (this is because the maximum least value for one of the sets is
) such that no two of them overlap and (2) the number of ways to arrange
“blocks” of
in the whole “grid” of length
given
increments per unit under no restrictions. We can easily see that the probability is
.
(The is included due to the four blocks
being able to be arranged order.)
Since there are infinite real numbers in a unit of , there are infinite increments in a unit of
, so we should take the limit as
approaches infinity:
Dividing leading coefficients, we get the probability to be
, which simplifies to
.
Thus, our answer is .
Note: This problem is probably way too hard to appear on an AMC 10
Solution 2 (Fakesolve)
Note that the answer probably looks like , and based on the answer choices, we can guess that
is the desired probability, as
is a power of
and