Difference between revisions of "1997 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
(added solution) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
| − | {{ | + | |
| + | All rational numbers between 0 and 1 will eventually become 0 under this iterative process. To begin, note that by definition, all rational numbers can be written as a quotient of coprime integers. Let <math>x_0 = \frac{m}{n}</math>, where <math>m,n</math> are coprime positive integers. Since <math>0<x_0<1</math>, <math>0<m<n</math>. Now <cmath>x_1 = \left\{\frac{p_1}{\frac{m}{n}}\right\}=\left\{frac{np_1}{m}\right\}.</cmath> From this, we can see that applying the iterative process will decrease the value of the denominator, since <math>m<n</math>. Moreover, the numerator is always smaller than the denominator, thanks to the fractional part operator. So we have a strictly decreasing denominator that bounds the numerator. Thus, the numerator will eventually become 0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On the other hand, irrational <math>x_0</math> will never become 0, because <math>x_k</math> will always be irrational. | ||
| + | |||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
{{USAMO newbox|year=1997|before=First Question|num-a=2}} | {{USAMO newbox|year=1997|before=First Question|num-a=2}} | ||
Revision as of 05:12, 3 August 2013
Problem
Let
be the prime numbers listed in increasing order, and let
be a real number between
and
. For positive integer
, define
where
denotes the fractional part of
. (The fractional part of
is given by
where
is the greatest integer less than or equal to
.) Find, with proof, all
satisfying
for which the sequence
eventually becomes
.
Solution
All rational numbers between 0 and 1 will eventually become 0 under this iterative process. To begin, note that by definition, all rational numbers can be written as a quotient of coprime integers. Let
, where
are coprime positive integers. Since
,
. Now
From this, we can see that applying the iterative process will decrease the value of the denominator, since
. Moreover, the numerator is always smaller than the denominator, thanks to the fractional part operator. So we have a strictly decreasing denominator that bounds the numerator. Thus, the numerator will eventually become 0.
On the other hand, irrational
will never become 0, because
will always be irrational.
See Also
| 1997 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by First Question |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.