Difference between revisions of "2002 AIME I Problems/Problem 4"
Keeper1098 (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2) |
Brandonyee (talk | contribs) (→Solution 3) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Solution 1 == | == Solution 1 == | ||
− | <math>\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}=\dfrac{1}{k(k+1)}=\dfrac{1}{k}-\dfrac{1}{k+1}</math>. Thus, | + | Using [[partial fraction decomposition]] yields <math>\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}=\dfrac{1}{k(k+1)}=\dfrac{1}{k}-\dfrac{1}{k+1}</math>. Thus, |
<math>a_m+a_{m+1}+\cdots +a_{n-1}=\dfrac{1}{m}-\dfrac{1}{m+1}+\dfrac{1}{m+1}-\dfrac{1}{m+2}+\cdots +\dfrac{1}{n-1}-\dfrac{1}{n}=\dfrac{1}{m}-\dfrac{1}{n}</math> | <math>a_m+a_{m+1}+\cdots +a_{n-1}=\dfrac{1}{m}-\dfrac{1}{m+1}+\dfrac{1}{m+1}-\dfrac{1}{m+2}+\cdots +\dfrac{1}{n-1}-\dfrac{1}{n}=\dfrac{1}{m}-\dfrac{1}{n}</math> | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>n=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>. This is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. | *If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>n=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>. This is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. | ||
− | |||
== Solution 2 == | == Solution 2 == | ||
Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
~ keeper1098 | ~ keeper1098 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 3 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | To solve this problem, I need to find two positive integers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> where <math>m < n</math> and the sum of sequence terms equals <math>\frac{1}{29}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, let me simplify <math>a_k = \frac{1}{k^2 + k}</math> using partial fractions. | ||
+ | <math>a_k = \frac{1}{k(k+1)} = \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Express the sum <math>a_m + a_{m+1} + \cdots + a_{n-1}</math> using this simplification. | ||
+ | <math>a_m + a_{m+1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} = \sum_{k=m}^{n-1} \left(\frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1}\right)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is a telescoping series where intermediate terms cancel: | ||
+ | <math>a_m + a_{m+1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} = \frac{1}{m} - \frac{1}{n}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Use the given condition that this sum equals <math>\frac{1}{29}</math>. | ||
+ | <math>\frac{1}{m} - \frac{1}{n} = \frac{1}{29}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Multiplying both sides by <math>mn</math>: | ||
+ | <math>n - m = \frac{mn}{29}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rearranging: | ||
+ | <math>29(n - m) = mn</math> | ||
+ | <math>29n - 29m = mn</math> | ||
+ | <math>29n - mn = 29m</math> | ||
+ | <math>n(29 - m) = 29m</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Solve for <math>n</math> in terms of <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | <math>n = \frac{29m}{29-m}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>n</math> must be a positive integer, <math>29-m</math> must divide <math>29m</math> evenly. | ||
+ | Since <math>29</math> is prime, for <math>29-m</math> to divide <math>29m</math> (when <math>m < 29</math>), we need <math>29-m</math> to divide <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This means <math>m = k(29-m)</math> for some positive integer <math>k</math>. | ||
+ | <math>m = k(29-m)</math> | ||
+ | <math>m = 29k - km</math> | ||
+ | <math>m(1+k) = 29k</math> | ||
+ | <math>m = \frac{29k}{1+k}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | For <math>m</math> to be an integer, <math>1+k</math> must divide <math>29k</math>. | ||
+ | When <math>k = 28</math>, we get <math>m = \frac{29(28)}{29} = 28</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Calculate <math>n</math> using our value of <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | <math>n = \frac{29(28)}{29-28} = \frac{812}{1} = 812</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, <math>m + n = 28 + 812 = \boxed{840}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~ brandonyee | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Video Solution by OmegaLearn == | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/lH-0ul1hwKw?t=134 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~ pi_is_3.14 | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2002|n=I|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{AIME box|year=2002|n=I|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 22:32, 6 March 2025
Problem
Consider the sequence defined by for
. Given that
, for positive integers
and
with
, find
.
Solution 1
Using partial fraction decomposition yields . Thus,
Which means that
Since we need a factor of 29 in the denominator, we let .* Substituting, we get
so
Since is an integer,
, so
. It quickly follows that
and
, so
.
*If, a similar argument to the one above implies
and
, which implies
. This is impossible since
.
Solution 2
Note that . This can be proven by induction. Thus,
. Cross-multiplying yields
, and adding
to both sides gives
. Clearly,
and
. Hence,
,
, and
.
~ keeper1098
Solution 3
To solve this problem, I need to find two positive integers and
where
and the sum of sequence terms equals
.
First, let me simplify using partial fractions.
Express the sum using this simplification.
This is a telescoping series where intermediate terms cancel:
Use the given condition that this sum equals .
Multiplying both sides by :
Rearranging:
Solve for in terms of
.
Since must be a positive integer,
must divide
evenly.
Since
is prime, for
to divide
(when
), we need
to divide
.
This means for some positive integer
.
For to be an integer,
must divide
.
When
, we get
Calculate using our value of
.
Therefore,
~ brandonyee
Video Solution by OmegaLearn
https://youtu.be/lH-0ul1hwKw?t=134
~ pi_is_3.14
See also
2002 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.