Difference between revisions of "2006 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
m (→Solution) |
m (→Hint) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<cmath> (a_1-a_0) + (a_2-a_1) + \dotsb + (a_r-a_{r-1}) = a_r-a_0 = 0, </cmath> | <cmath> (a_1-a_0) + (a_2-a_1) + \dotsb + (a_r-a_{r-1}) = a_r-a_0 = 0, </cmath> | ||
it follows that for some index <math>j</math>, | it follows that for some index <math>j</math>, | ||
− | <cmath> a_j - a_{j+1} = -(a_{j+ | + | <cmath> a_j - a_{j+1} = -(a_{j+1} - a_{j+2}), </cmath> |
or <math>a_j = a_{j+2} = P^2(a_j)</math>. Since <math>a = a_r = P^{r-j}(a_j)</math>, it then follows that <math>P^2(a) = a</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | or <math>a_j = a_{j+2} = P^2(a_j)</math>. Since <math>a = a_r = P^{r-j}(a_j)</math>, it then follows that <math>P^2(a) = a</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
+ | == Hints == | ||
+ | Try to use contradiction: | ||
+ | Q(<math>x_1</math>)=<math>x_1</math>,<math>...</math>,Q(<math>x_{n+1}</math>)=<math>x_{n+1}</math>. WLOG suppose <math>x_1<...<x_{n+1}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Think of using the theorem <math>a-b \mid f(a)-f(b)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You will slowly get that |P(<math>x_i</math>)-P(<math>x_j</math>)|= <math>x_i-x_j</math> (i<j). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Try to prove that P(<math>x_1</math>),...,P(<math>x_{n+1}</math>) is either increasing or decreasing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Construct a polynomial to give the final contradiction by keeping in mind the theorem: | ||
+ | If the equation f(x)=<math>a</math> (<math>a</math> is a constant)has more roots than deg(f), then f=a. | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
Line 49: | Line 61: | ||
{{IMO box|year=2006|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{IMO box|year=2006|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Olympiad Number Theory Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Number Theory Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 00:21, 1 October 2025
Contents
Problem
(Dan Schwarz, Romania)
Let be a polynomial of degree
with integer coefficients, and let
be a positive integer. Consider the polynomial
, where
occurs
times. Prove that there are at most
integers
such that
.
Solution
We use the notation for
.
Lemma 1. The problem statement holds for .
Proof. Suppose that ,
are integers such that
and
for all indices
. Let the set
have
distinct elements. It suffices to show that
.
If for all indices
, then the polynomial
has at least
roots; since
is not linear, it follows that
by the division algorithm.
Suppose on the other hand that , for some index
. In this case, we claim that
is constant for every index
. Indeed, we note that
so
. Similarly,
so
. It follows that
.
This proves our claim. It follows that the polynomial
has at least
roots. Since
is not linear it follows again that
, as desired. Thus the lemma is proven.
Lemma 2. If is a positive integer such that
for some positive integer
, then
.
Proof. Let us denote , and
, for positive integers
. Then
, and
It follows that
is constant for all indices
; let us abbreviate this quantity
. Now, since
it follows that for some index
,
or
. Since
, it then follows that
, as desired.
Now, if there are more than integers
for which
, then by Lemma 2, there are more than
integers
such that
, which is a contradiction by Lemma 1. Thus the problem is solved.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Hints
Try to use contradiction:
Q()=
,
,Q(
)=
. WLOG suppose
.
Think of using the theorem .
You will slowly get that |P()-P(
)|=
(i<j).
Try to prove that P(),...,P(
) is either increasing or decreasing.
Construct a polynomial to give the final contradiction by keeping in mind the theorem:
If the equation f(x)= (
is a constant)has more roots than deg(f), then f=a.
Resources
- 1974 USAMO Problems/Problem 1, which implies a special case of this problem
2006 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |