Difference between revisions of "2002 AIME II Problems/Problem 13"
m (→Solution 3) |
Faliure167 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
draw(B--E); | draw(B--E); | ||
</asy> | </asy> | ||
| − | Use the mass of point. Denoting the mass of <math>C=15,B=6,A=5,D=21,E=20</math>, we can see that the mass of P is <math>26</math>, hence we know that <math>\frac{BP}{PE}=\frac{10}{3}</math>, now we can find that <math>\frac{PQ}{AE}=\frac{10}{13}</math> which implies <math>PQ=\frac{30}{13}</math>, it is obvious that <math>\triangle{PQR}</math> is similar to <math>\triangle{ACB}</math> so we need to find the ration between PQ and AC, which is easy, it is <math>\frac{15}{26}</math>, so our final answer is <math>\left( \frac{15}{26} \right)^2= \frac{225}{676}</math> which is <math>\boxed{901}</math>. ~bluesoul | + | Use the mass of point. Denoting the mass of <math>C=15,B=6,A=5,D=21,E=20</math>, we can see that the mass of <math>P</math> is <math>26</math>, hence we know that <math>\frac{BP}{PE}=\frac{10}{3}</math>, now we can find that <math>\frac{PQ}{AE}=\frac{10}{13}</math> which implies <math>PQ=\frac{30}{13}</math>, it is obvious that <math>\triangle{PQR}</math> is similar to <math>\triangle{ACB}</math> so we need to find the ration between PQ and AC, which is easy, it is <math>\frac{15}{26}</math>, so our final answer is <math>\left( \frac{15}{26} \right)^2= \frac{225}{676}</math> which is <math>\boxed{901}</math>. ~bluesoul |
| + | |||
| + | ==Solution 4(Ceva & Menelaus)== | ||
| + | Construct <math>\overline{CP}</math> and extend it to line <math>\overline{AB}</math> at point <math>F</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <asy> | ||
| + | size(10cm); | ||
| + | pair A,B,C,D,E,F,P,Q,R; | ||
| + | A=(0,0); | ||
| + | B=(8,0); | ||
| + | C=(1.9375,3.4994); | ||
| + | D=(3.6696,2.4996); | ||
| + | E=(1.4531,2.6246); | ||
| + | F=(4.3636,0); | ||
| + | P=(2.9639,2.0189); | ||
| + | Q=(1.8462,0); | ||
| + | R=(6.4615,0); | ||
| + | dot(A); | ||
| + | dot(B); | ||
| + | dot(C); | ||
| + | dot(D); | ||
| + | dot(E); | ||
| + | dot(F); | ||
| + | dot(P); | ||
| + | dot(Q); | ||
| + | dot(R); | ||
| + | label("$A$",A,WSW); | ||
| + | label("$B$",B,ESE); | ||
| + | label("$C$",C,NNW); | ||
| + | label("$D$",D,NE); | ||
| + | label("$E$",E,WNW); | ||
| + | label("$F$",F,SSE); | ||
| + | label("$P$",P,NNE); | ||
| + | label("$Q$",Q,SSW); | ||
| + | label("$R$",R,SE); | ||
| + | draw(A--B--C--cycle); | ||
| + | draw(P--Q--R--cycle); | ||
| + | draw(A--D); | ||
| + | draw(B--E); | ||
| + | draw(C--F); | ||
| + | </asy> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using Ceva's Theorem on triangle <math>ABC</math> and point <math>P</math>, we get <cmath>\frac{AF}{BF} \times \frac{BD}{CD} \times \frac{CE}{AE}=1</cmath> | ||
| + | Thus, <math>\frac{AF}{BF}=\frac{6}{5}</math>. | ||
| + | Then, using this info, we apply Menelaus on triangle <math>ACF</math> and line <math>BE</math>, obtaining <cmath>\frac{AE}{BE} \times \frac{CP}{FP} \times \frac{FB}{AB}=1</cmath> | ||
| + | Simplifying and substituting, we find that <math>\frac{CP}{FP}=\frac{11}{15}</math>. | ||
| + | Alternatively, <math>\frac{FP}{CF}=\frac{15}{26}</math>, which is also the ratio between the heights of the desired triangles. | ||
| + | Finishing, <math>\left( \frac{15}{26} \right)^2= \frac{225}{676}</math> achieving the final answer of <math>\boxed{901}</math>. | ||
| + | ~faliure167 | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Latest revision as of 23:10, 1 February 2025
Problem
In triangle
point
is on
with
and
point
is on
with
and
and
and
intersect at
Points
and
lie on
so that
is parallel to
and
is parallel to
It is given that the ratio of the area of triangle
to the area of triangle
is
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Solution 1
Let
be the intersection of
and
.
Since
and
,
and
. So
, and thus,
.
Using mass points:
WLOG, let
.
Then:
.
.
.
.
Thus,
. Therefore,
, and
. Note we can just use mass points to get
which is
.
Solution 2
First draw
and extend it so that it meets with
at point
.
We have that
By Ceva's,
That means that
Now we apply mass points. Assume WLOG that
. That means that
Notice now that
is similar to
. Therefore,
Also,
is similar to
. Therefore,
Because
is similar to
,
.
As a result,
.
Therefore,
- Not the author writing here, but a note is that Ceva's Theorem was actually not necessary to solve this problem. The information was just nice to know :)
Solution 3
Use the mass of point. Denoting the mass of
, we can see that the mass of
is
, hence we know that
, now we can find that
which implies
, it is obvious that
is similar to
so we need to find the ration between PQ and AC, which is easy, it is
, so our final answer is
which is
. ~bluesoul
Solution 4(Ceva & Menelaus)
Construct
and extend it to line
at point
.
Using Ceva's Theorem on triangle
and point
, we get
Thus,
.
Then, using this info, we apply Menelaus on triangle
and line
, obtaining
Simplifying and substituting, we find that
.
Alternatively,
, which is also the ratio between the heights of the desired triangles.
Finishing,
achieving the final answer of
.
~faliure167
See also
| 2002 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 12 |
Followed by Problem 14 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
| All AIME Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.