Difference between revisions of "1995 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(Solution 9 is incorrect, the denominator should be upper bounded by 6 but author proved that its bigger) |
Sneekifnyt1 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
~th1nq3r | ~th1nq3r | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 9 == | ||
+ | ## Inequality Proof | ||
+ | |||
+ | We want to prove that | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{1}{a^3(b+c)}+\frac{1}{b^3(c+a)}+\frac{1}{c^3(a+b)} \geq \frac{3}{2}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | given that <math>abc = 1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Step 1. Substitution.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>x = \frac{1}{a}</math>, <math>y = \frac{1}{b}</math>, <math>z = \frac{1}{c}</math>. Then <math>xyz = 1</math>, and | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{1}{a^3(b+c)} = \frac{x^2}{y+z}, \quad \frac{1}{b^3(c+a)} = \frac{y^2}{z+x}, \quad \frac{1}{c^3(a+b)} = \frac{z^2}{x+y}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | So the inequality becomes | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{x^2}{y+z}+\frac{y^2}{z+x}+\frac{z^2}{x+y} \geq \frac{3}{2}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Step 2. AM-GM proof.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Multiplying through by <math>(x + y)(y + z)(z + x)</math>, it is equivalent to | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>x^2(x+y)(x+z) + y^2(y+z)(y+x) + z^2(z+x)(z+y) \geq \frac{3}{2}(x+y)(y+z)(z+x)</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Expanding shows that we need | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{2}{3}\left(x^4+y^4+z^4+x^3y+\cdots+z^2xy\right) \geq x^2y+x^2z+y^2x+y^2z+z^2x+z^2y+2xyz</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now apply AM-GM in groups, for example | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{x^4+x^3y+y^3z}{3}\geq x^2y, \quad \frac{y^4+y^3z+z^3x}{3}\geq y^2z</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | and similarly for the other four symmetric terms, plus | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{2(x^2yz+y^2zx+z^2xy)}{3}\geq 2xyz</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Adding all these inequalities gives exactly the required result. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Conclusion:** Therefore, | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{1}{a^3(b+c)}+\frac{1}{b^3(c+a)}+\frac{1}{c^3(a+b)} \geq \frac{3}{2}</cmath> ∎ | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 30 September 2025
Contents
Problem
(Nazar Agakhanov, Russia)
Let be positive real numbers such that
. Prove that
Solution
Solution 1
We make the substitution ,
,
. Then
Since
and
are similarly sorted sequences, it follows from the Rearrangement Inequality that
By the Power Mean Inequality,
Symmetric application of this argument yields
Finally, AM-GM gives us
as desired.
Solution 2
We make the same substitution as in the first solution. We note that in general,
It follows that
and
are similarly sorted sequences. Then by Chebyshev's Inequality,
By AM-GM,
, and by Nesbitt's Inequality,
The desired conclusion follows.
Solution 3
Without clever substitutions:
By Cauchy-Schwarz, Dividing by
gives
by AM-GM.
Solution 3b
Without clever notation:
By Cauchy-Schwarz,
Dividing by and noting that
by AM-GM gives
as desired.
Solution 4
After the setting and as
so
concluding
By Titu Lemma,
Now by AM-GM we know that
and
which concludes to
Therefore we get
Hence our claim is proved ~~ Aritra12
Solution 5
Proceed as in Solution 1, to arrive at the equivalent inequality
But we know that
by AM-GM. Furthermore,
by Cauchy-Schwarz, and so dividing by
gives
as desired.
Solution 6
Without clever substitutions, and only AM-GM!
Note that . The cyclic sum becomes
. Note that by AM-GM, the cyclic sum is greater than or equal to
. We now see that we have the three so we must be on the right path. We now only need to show that
. Notice that by AM-GM,
,
, and
. Thus, we see that
, concluding that
.
^ This solution is incorrect, as it does not prove inequalities in the right direction. Proving that , and
does not show that
.
Solution 7 from Brilliant Wiki (Muirheads) =
https://brilliant.org/wiki/muirhead-inequality/
Solution 8 (fast Titu's Lemma no substitutions)
Rewrite as
.
Now applying Titu's lemma yields .
Now applying the AM-GM inequality on . The result now follows.
Note: , because
. (Why? Because
, and hence
).
~th1nq3r
Solution 9
- Inequality Proof
We want to prove that
given that .
---
- Step 1. Substitution.**
Let ,
,
. Then
, and
So the inequality becomes
---
- Step 2. AM-GM proof.**
Multiplying through by , it is equivalent to
Expanding shows that we need
Now apply AM-GM in groups, for example
and similarly for the other four symmetric terms, plus
Adding all these inequalities gives exactly the required result.
---
- Conclusion:** Therefore,
∎
Scroll all the way down
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
1995 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |