Difference between revisions of "2023 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 24"
Pinotation (talk | contribs) |
Pinotation (talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<math>\textbf{(A)}~30\qquad\textbf{(B)}~45\qquad\textbf{(C)}~3\qquad\textbf{(D)}~15\qquad\textbf{(E)}~6</math> | <math>\textbf{(A)}~30\qquad\textbf{(B)}~45\qquad\textbf{(C)}~3\qquad\textbf{(D)}~15\qquad\textbf{(E)}~6</math> | ||
− | ==Solution 1 | + | ==Solution 1== |
− | + | Denote by <math>\nu_p (x)</math> the number of prime factor <math>p</math> in number <math>x</math>. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Denote by < | ||
We index Equations given in this problem from (1) to (7). | We index Equations given in this problem from (1) to (7). | ||
− | First, we compute < | + | First, we compute <math>\nu_2 (x)</math> for <math>x \in \left\{ a, b, c, d \right\}</math>. |
− | Equation (5) implies < | + | Equation (5) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_2 (b), \nu_2 (c) \right\} = 1</math>. |
− | Equation (2) implies < | + | Equation (2) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_2 (a), \nu_2 (b) \right\} = 3</math>. |
− | Equation (6) implies < | + | Equation (6) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_2 (b), \nu_2 (d) \right\} = 2</math>. |
− | Equation (1) implies < | + | Equation (1) implies <math>\nu_2 (a) + \nu_2 (b) + \nu_2 (c) + \nu_2 (d) = 6</math>. |
− | Therefore, all above jointly imply < | + | Therefore, all above jointly imply <math>\nu_2 (a) = 3</math>, <math>\nu_2 (d) = 2</math>, and <math>\left( \nu_2 (b), \nu_2 (c) \right) = \left( 0 , 1 \right)</math> or <math>\left( 1, 0 \right)</math>. |
− | Second, we compute < | + | Second, we compute <math>\nu_3 (x)</math> for <math>x \in \left\{ a, b, c, d \right\}</math>. |
− | Equation (2) implies < | + | Equation (2) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_3 (a), \nu_3 (b) \right\} = 2</math>. |
− | Equation (3) implies < | + | Equation (3) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_3 (a), \nu_3 (c) \right\} = 3</math>. |
− | Equation (4) implies < | + | Equation (4) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_3 (a), \nu_3 (d) \right\} = 3</math>. |
− | Equation (1) implies < | + | Equation (1) implies <math>\nu_3 (a) + \nu_3 (b) + \nu_3 (c) + \nu_3 (d) = 9</math>. |
− | Therefore, all above jointly imply < | + | Therefore, all above jointly imply <math>\nu_3 (c) = 3</math>, <math>\nu_3 (d) = 3</math>, and <math>\left( \nu_3 (a), \nu_3 (b) \right) = \left( 1 , 2 \right)</math> or <math>\left( 2, 1 \right)</math>. |
− | Third, we compute < | + | Third, we compute <math>\nu_5 (x)</math> for <math>x \in \left\{ a, b, c, d \right\}</math>. |
− | Equation (5) implies < | + | Equation (5) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_5 (b), \nu_5 (c) \right\} = 2</math>. |
− | Equation (2) implies < | + | Equation (2) implies <math>\max \left\{ \nu_5 (a), \nu_5 (b) \right\} = 3</math>. |
− | Thus, < | + | Thus, <math>\nu_5 (a) = 3</math>. |
− | From Equations (5)-(7), we have either < | + | From Equations (5)-(7), we have either <math>\nu_5 (b) \leq 1</math> and <math>\nu_5 (c) = \nu_5 (d) = 2</math>, or <math>\nu_5 (b) = 2</math> and <math>\max \left\{ \nu_5 (c), \nu_5 (d) \right\} = 2</math>. |
− | Equation (1) implies < | + | Equation (1) implies <math>\nu_5 (a) + \nu_5 (b) + \nu_5 (c) + \nu_5 (d) = 7</math>. |
− | Thus, for < | + | Thus, for <math>\nu_5 (b)</math>, <math>\nu_5 (c)</math>, <math>\nu_5 (d)</math>, there must be two 2s and one 0. |
Therefore, | Therefore, | ||
Line 68: | Line 64: | ||
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) | ~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com) | ||
− | ==Solution | + | ==Solution 2 (GCD/LCM Comparison)== |
− | We are given that < | + | We are given that <math>abcd = 2^6 \cdot 3^9 \cdot 5^7</math>, and several LCM relations involving pairs of these numbers. Notice that |
− | < | + | <math>\[ |
\mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) = (2^3 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3) \cdot (2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5^2) = 2^{5} \cdot 3^{5} \cdot 5^{5}. | \mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) = (2^3 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3) \cdot (2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5^2) = 2^{5} \cdot 3^{5} \cdot 5^{5}. | ||
− | \]<math> | + | \]</math> |
− | Comparing this product with < | + | Comparing this product with <math>abcd</math>, we see that |
− | < | + | <math>\[ |
abcd = 2^6 \cdot 3^9 \cdot 5^7 = \mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) \cdot 2^1 \cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2. | abcd = 2^6 \cdot 3^9 \cdot 5^7 = \mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) \cdot 2^1 \cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2. | ||
− | \]<math> | + | \]</math> |
− | This additional factor < | + | This additional factor <math>2^1 \cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2</math> must be accounted for by the overlaps among <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, <math>c</math>, <math>d</math>, which are their common divisors. |
− | The key observation is that the only prime with a leftover exponent greater than 3 is 3 (specifically, < | + | The key observation is that the only prime with a leftover exponent greater than 3 is 3 (specifically, <math>3^4</math>), which suggests that all four numbers share at least one factor of 3. |
− | For primes 2 and 5, the leftover exponents are too small (1 and 2, respectively) to be shared by all four numbers, since the GCD exponent must be the minimum exponent among < | + | For primes 2 and 5, the leftover exponents are too small (1 and 2, respectively) to be shared by all four numbers, since the GCD exponent must be the minimum exponent among <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, <math>c</math>, <math>d</math>. |
− | Thus, the only possible nontrivial common factor among < | + | Thus, the only possible nontrivial common factor among <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, <math>c</math>, <math>d</math> is 3. |
Therefore, | Therefore, |
Latest revision as of 01:43, 19 September 2025
Problem
Suppose that ,
,
and
are positive integers satisfying all of the following relations.
What is ?
Solution 1
Denote by the number of prime factor
in number
.
We index Equations given in this problem from (1) to (7).
First, we compute for
.
Equation (5) implies .
Equation (2) implies
.
Equation (6) implies
.
Equation (1) implies
.
Therefore, all above jointly imply ,
, and
or
.
Second, we compute for
.
Equation (2) implies .
Equation (3) implies
.
Equation (4) implies
.
Equation (1) implies
.
Therefore, all above jointly imply ,
, and
or
.
Third, we compute for
.
Equation (5) implies .
Equation (2) implies
.
Thus,
.
From Equations (5)-(7), we have either and
, or
and
.
Equation (1) implies .
Thus, for
,
,
, there must be two 2s and one 0.
Therefore,
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
Solution 2 (GCD/LCM Comparison)
We are given that , and several LCM relations involving pairs of these numbers. Notice that
$\[ \mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) = (2^3 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^3) \cdot (2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5^2) = 2^{5} \cdot 3^{5} \cdot 5^{5}. \]$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
Comparing this product with , we see that
$\[ abcd = 2^6 \cdot 3^9 \cdot 5^7 = \mathrm{lcm}(a,b) \cdot \mathrm{lcm}(c,d) \cdot 2^1 \cdot 3^4 \cdot 5^2. \]$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
This additional factor must be accounted for by the overlaps among
,
,
,
, which are their common divisors.
The key observation is that the only prime with a leftover exponent greater than 3 is 3 (specifically, ), which suggests that all four numbers share at least one factor of 3.
For primes 2 and 5, the leftover exponents are too small (1 and 2, respectively) to be shared by all four numbers, since the GCD exponent must be the minimum exponent among ,
,
,
.
Thus, the only possible nontrivial common factor among ,
,
,
is 3.
Therefore,
\[ \gcd(a,b,c,d) = \boxed {3}. \]
~Mewoooow
Video Solution
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
See Also
2023 AMC 12B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 23 |
Followed by Problem 25 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.