Difference between revisions of "Mathematical problem solving"
(→An Historical Example) |
RocketSingh (talk | contribs) m (→A Historical Example) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The idea behind The [[Art of Problem Solving]] as well as many [[math competitions]] is the use of creative methods to solve problems. In a way, students are discouraged to use rote memorization as opposed to creative spontaneous thinking. Mathematical problem solving involves using all the tools at one's disposal to attack a problem in a new way. | + | The idea behind The [[Art of Problem Solving]] as well as many [[math competitions]] is the use of creative methods to solve problems. In a way, students are discouraged to use rote memorization as opposed to creative spontaneous thinking. Mathematical [[problem solving]] involves using all the tools at one's disposal to attack a problem in a new way. |
| + | |||
| + | == A Historical Example == | ||
| + | An interesting example of this kind of thinking is the calculation of the sum of the [[series]] <math>\frac11 + \frac14 + \frac19 + \cdots + \frac{1}{n^2} + \cdots</math><br> | ||
| + | The famous [[mathematician]] [[Leonhard Euler]] used the fact that:<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>\sin{x}=x-\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}-\cdots</math><br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The zeros of <math>\sin{x}</math> are at <math>0</math>, <math>\pm \pi</math>, <math>\pm{2\pi}</math>, etc. so Euler made the leap of claiming that the [[polynomial]] on the right hand side can be factored as<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>x-\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}-\cdots=x\left(1-\frac{x}{\pi}\right)\left(1+\frac{x}{\pi}\right)\left(1-\frac{x}{2\pi}\right)\left(1+\frac{x}{2\pi}\right)\cdots</math><br> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
since both sides are 0 at the same places. Dividing both sides by x and simplifying the right side, we get<br> | since both sides are 0 at the same places. Dividing both sides by x and simplifying the right side, we get<br> | ||
| − | <math>1-\frac{x^2}{3!}+\frac{x^4}{5!}- | + | |
| + | <math>1-\frac{x^2}{3!}+\frac{x^4}{5!}-\cdots=\left(1-\frac{x^2}{\pi^2}\right)\left(1-\frac{x^2}{4\pi^2}\right)\left(1-\frac{x^2}{9\pi^2}\right)\cdots</math><br> | ||
| + | |||
The constant terms of both sides agree, both being 1, so this crazy procedure might be valid. Setting the <math>x^2</math> coefficients equal, we have<br> | The constant terms of both sides agree, both being 1, so this crazy procedure might be valid. Setting the <math>x^2</math> coefficients equal, we have<br> | ||
| − | <math>-\frac16 = -\frac{1}{\pi^2}-\frac{1}{4\pi^2}-\frac{1}{9\pi^2}- | + | |
| + | <math>-\frac16 = -\frac{1}{\pi^2}-\frac{1}{4\pi^2}-\frac{1}{9\pi^2}-\cdots</math><br> | ||
| + | |||
or, multiplying both sides by -<math>\pi^2</math>,<br> | or, multiplying both sides by -<math>\pi^2</math>,<br> | ||
| + | |||
<math>\frac{\pi^2}{6}=\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3^2}+\cdots</math><br> | <math>\frac{\pi^2}{6}=\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+\frac{1}{3^2}+\cdots</math><br> | ||
| − | '''''-Quoted from [ | + | |
| + | '''''-Quoted from [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Store/viewitem.php?item=ps:aops2 Art of Problem Solving Volume 2], page 258''''' | ||
Latest revision as of 05:45, 1 May 2014
The idea behind The Art of Problem Solving as well as many math competitions is the use of creative methods to solve problems. In a way, students are discouraged to use rote memorization as opposed to creative spontaneous thinking. Mathematical problem solving involves using all the tools at one's disposal to attack a problem in a new way.
A Historical Example
An interesting example of this kind of thinking is the calculation of the sum of the series ![]()
The famous mathematician Leonhard Euler used the fact that:
![]()
The zeros of
are at
,
,
, etc. so Euler made the leap of claiming that the polynomial on the right hand side can be factored as
![]()
since both sides are 0 at the same places. Dividing both sides by x and simplifying the right side, we get
![]()
The constant terms of both sides agree, both being 1, so this crazy procedure might be valid. Setting the
coefficients equal, we have
![]()
or, multiplying both sides by -
,
![]()
-Quoted from Art of Problem Solving Volume 2, page 258