Difference between revisions of "2017 AIME I Problems/Problem 13"

m
(Solution 3)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
For every <math>m \geq 2</math>, let <math>Q(m)</math> be the least positive integer with the following property: For every <math>n \geq Q(m)</math>, there is always a perfect cube <math>k^3</math> in the range <math>n < k^3 \leq m \cdot n</math>. Find the remainder when <cmath>\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m)</cmath>is divided by 1000.
 
For every <math>m \geq 2</math>, let <math>Q(m)</math> be the least positive integer with the following property: For every <math>n \geq Q(m)</math>, there is always a perfect cube <math>k^3</math> in the range <math>n < k^3 \leq m \cdot n</math>. Find the remainder when <cmath>\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m)</cmath>is divided by 1000.
  
==Solution==
+
==Solution 1==
Lemma 1: The ratios between <math>k^3</math> and <math>(k+1)^3</math> decreases as <math>k</math> increases.
+
Lemma 1: The ratio between <math>k^3</math> and <math>(k+1)^3</math> decreases as <math>k</math> increases.
  
Lemma 2: If the range <math>(n,mn]</math> includes two cubes, <math>(p,mp]</math> will always contain at least one cube for all integers in <math>[n,+\infty)</math>.
+
Lemma 2: If the range <math>(n,mn]</math> includes <math>y</math> cubes, <math>(p,mp]</math> will always contain at least <math>y-1</math> cubes for all <math>p</math> in <math>[n,+\infty)</math>.
  
If <math>m=14</math>, the range <math>(1,14]</math> includes one cube. The range <math>(2,28]</math> includes 2 cubes, which fulfills the Lemma. Since <math>n=1</math> also included a cube, we can assume that <math>Q(m)=1</math> for all <math>m>14</math>. Two groups of 1000 are included in the sum modulo 1000. They do not count since <math>Q(m)=1</math> for all of them, therefore <cmath>\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m) = \sum_{m = 2}^{17} Q(m)</cmath>
+
If <math>m=14</math>, the range <math>(1,14]</math> includes one cube. The range <math>(2,28]</math> includes 2 cubes, which fulfills the Lemma. Since <math>n=1</math> also included a cube, we can assume that <math>Q(m)=1</math> for all <math>m>14</math>. Two groups of 1000 are included in the sum modulo 1000. They do not count since <math>Q(m)=1</math> for all of them, therefore <cmath>\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m) \equiv \sum_{m = 2}^{17} Q(m) \mod 1000</cmath>
 +
 
 +
Now that we know this we will find the smallest <math>n</math> that causes <math>(n,mn]</math> to contain two cubes and work backwards (recursion) until there is no cube in <math>(n,mn]</math>.
 +
 
 +
For <math>m=2</math> there are two cubes in <math>(n,2n]</math> for <math>n=63</math>. There are no cubes in <math>(31,62]</math> but there is one in <math>(32,64]</math>. Therefore <math>Q(2)=32</math>.
 +
 
 +
For <math>m=3</math> there are two cubes in <math>(n,3n]</math> for <math>n=22</math>. There are no cubes in <math>(8,24]</math> but there is one in <math>(9,27]</math>. Therefore <math>Q(3)=9</math>.
 +
 
 +
For <math>m</math> in <math>\{4,5,6,7\}</math> there are two cubes in <math>(n,4n]</math> for <math>n=7</math>. There are no cubes in <math>(1,4]</math> but there is one in <math>(2,8]</math>. Therefore <math>Q(4)=2</math>, and the same for <math>Q(5)</math>, <math>Q(6)</math>, and <math>Q(7)</math> for a sum of <math>8</math>.
 +
 
 +
For all other <math>m</math> there is one cube in <math>(1,8]</math>, <math>(2,16]</math>, <math>(3,24]</math>, and there are two in <math>(4,32]</math>. Therefore, since there are 10 values of <math>m</math> in the sum, this part sums to <math>10</math>.
 +
 
 +
When the partial sums are added, we get <math>\boxed{059}\hspace{2 mm}QED\hspace{2 mm} \blacksquare</math>
 +
 
 +
This solution is brought to you by [[User:a1b2|a1b2]]
 +
 
 +
==Solution 2==
 +
 
 +
We claim that <math>Q(m) = 1</math> when <math>m \ge 8</math>.
 +
 
 +
When <math>m \ge 8</math>, for every <math>n \ge Q(m) = 1</math>, we need to prove there exists an integer <math>k</math>, such that <math>n < k^3 \le m \cdot n</math>.
 +
 
 +
That's because <math>\sqrt[3]{m \cdot n} - \sqrt[3]{n} \ge 2\sqrt[3]{n} - \sqrt[3]{n} = \sqrt[3]{n} \ge 1</math>, so k exists between <math>\sqrt[3]{m \cdot n}</math>  and <math>\sqrt[3]{n}</math>
 +
 
 +
<math>\sqrt[3]{n} < k \le \sqrt[3]{m \cdot n}</math>.
 +
 
 +
We can then hand evaluate <math>Q(m)</math> for <math>m = 2,3,4,5,6,7</math>, and get <math>Q(2) = 32</math>, <math>Q(3) = 9</math>, and all the others equal 2.
 +
 
 +
There are a total of 2010 integers from 8 to 2017.
 +
 
 +
<cmath>\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m) \equiv \sum_{m = 2}^{7} Q(m) + 2010 \equiv 32+9+2+2+2+2+10 = \boxed{059} \mod 1000</cmath>
 +
 
 +
-AlexLikeMath
 +
 
 +
==Solution 3==
 +
 
 +
Note that the problem is just asking for every <math>m \geq 2</math>, find the least <math>n</math> such that there lies a perfect cube in between of <math>n</math> and <math>mn</math> for every <math>n</math> after that minimum including the minimum. We consider <math>m = 2</math> first. Then, we need to find the least <math>n</math> such that for every <math>n</math> after this minimum <math>n</math>, including the minimum, there lies a perfect cube in between of <math>n</math> and <math>2n</math>. Let's denote the range notation as <math>(n, 2n)</math>. Hence, we start with <math>n = 1</math> to get the range of <math>(1, 2)</math>. Clearly, no perfect cube lies between these numbers. Then we go to <math>n = 2</math> to get <math>(2, 4)</math> and here also nothing works. We can see that the perfect cubes are <math>1, 8, 27 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000, ...</math>. Because <math>1</math> can't lie between two positive integers, we need to find the minimum <math>n</math> such that <math>8</math> is between <math>n</math> and <math>2n</math>. Clearly, <math>n = 4</math> will yield this case. We have the range <math>(4, 8)</math>. This works. We now list every <math>n</math> starting from <math>4</math> and see if all of these ranges host a perfect cube in between them. We have <math>(5, 10)</math> works, <math>(6, 12)</math> works <math>(7, 14)</math> works, but <math>(8, 16)</math> doesn't work. This is because the next perfect cube has to be <math>27</math>. Aha! Now we see the case. If we have a range in the following form <math>(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})</math>, this will clearly host a perfect cube between them which is <math>a^{3}</math>. But as we keep going, we need to put the next perfect cube after <math>a^{3}</math> into the range which is <math>(a + 1)^{3}</math>. We know that the next range after <math>(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})</math> is just <math>(a^{3}, 2a^{3})</math> because we double everything. Hence, <math>(a + 1)^{3}</math> must be in this range. If the perfect cube in between <math>a^{3}</math> and <math>2a^{3}</math> is of the form <math>a^{3} + \alpha</math>, we know that this added constant <math>\alpha</math> is greater than or equal to <math>(a + 1)^{3} - a^{3} = 3a^{2} + 3a + 1</math>. Hence, we let <math>\alpha = a</math> to solve <math>a^{3} \geq 3a^{2} + 3a + 1</math> and for integer solutions, we claim the answer is <math>a \geq 4</math>. We can prove this by induction.
 +
 
 +
Claim: <math>a^{3} \geq 3a^{2} + 3a + 1</math> for integer solutions exists when <math>a \geq 4</math>.
 +
 
 +
Proof: Let's plug in <math>a = 4</math> for our base case. We get: <math>64 \geq 48 + 12 + 1 = 61</math> which holds true. Hence, the inductive hypothesis is that <math>(a + 1)^{3} \geq 3(a + 1)^{2} + 3(a + 1) + 1</math> for all <math>a \geq 3</math>. In fact, we simplify to prove <math>a^{3} \geq 6a + 6</math> for all <math>a \geq 3</math>. Now, from our inductive assumption, we need to prove that <math>3a^{2} + 3a + 1 \geq 6a + 6</math>. Hence, <math>3a^{2} - 3a \geq 5</math> for all <math>a \geq 3</math>. Hence, we need to show <math>a^{2} - a \geq \frac{5}{3}</math> for all <math>a \geq 3</math>. But since we're proving this in the integer world, this is equivalent to proving that <math>a^{2} -a \geq 2</math> for all <math>a \geq 3</math>. Now we need to show that <math>a^{2} \geq a + 2</math>. Dividing by <math>a</math> because <math>a</math> is a positive integer means we have to show <math>a \geq 1 + \frac{2}{a}</math>. Now since <math>a \geq 3</math>, <math>\frac{2}{a} < 1</math> and so the <math>RHS</math> of the inequality can't even exceed <math>2</math> whereas the <math>LHS</math> of the inequality is already exceeding <math>2</math>. Therefore, the inductive hypothesis holds true and we are done.
 +
 
 +
What we have just shown now is that <math>a \geq 4</math>. Now note that the minimum range we found that worked was <math>(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})</math> where <math>n = \frac{a^{3}}{2}</math>. We plug in <math>a = 4</math> to get <math>n = 32</math> and hence <math>Q(2) = 32</math>. We can now apply the same procedure to the other numbers and finish as the above solutions.
 +
 
 +
~ilikemath247365
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
{{AIME box|year=2017|n=I|num-b=12|num-a=14}}
 
{{AIME box|year=2017|n=I|num-b=12|num-a=14}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}

Latest revision as of 19:55, 16 August 2025

Problem 13

For every $m \geq 2$, let $Q(m)$ be the least positive integer with the following property: For every $n \geq Q(m)$, there is always a perfect cube $k^3$ in the range $n < k^3 \leq m \cdot n$. Find the remainder when \[\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m)\]is divided by 1000.

Solution 1

Lemma 1: The ratio between $k^3$ and $(k+1)^3$ decreases as $k$ increases.

Lemma 2: If the range $(n,mn]$ includes $y$ cubes, $(p,mp]$ will always contain at least $y-1$ cubes for all $p$ in $[n,+\infty)$.

If $m=14$, the range $(1,14]$ includes one cube. The range $(2,28]$ includes 2 cubes, which fulfills the Lemma. Since $n=1$ also included a cube, we can assume that $Q(m)=1$ for all $m>14$. Two groups of 1000 are included in the sum modulo 1000. They do not count since $Q(m)=1$ for all of them, therefore \[\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m) \equiv \sum_{m = 2}^{17} Q(m) \mod 1000\]

Now that we know this we will find the smallest $n$ that causes $(n,mn]$ to contain two cubes and work backwards (recursion) until there is no cube in $(n,mn]$.

For $m=2$ there are two cubes in $(n,2n]$ for $n=63$. There are no cubes in $(31,62]$ but there is one in $(32,64]$. Therefore $Q(2)=32$.

For $m=3$ there are two cubes in $(n,3n]$ for $n=22$. There are no cubes in $(8,24]$ but there is one in $(9,27]$. Therefore $Q(3)=9$.

For $m$ in $\{4,5,6,7\}$ there are two cubes in $(n,4n]$ for $n=7$. There are no cubes in $(1,4]$ but there is one in $(2,8]$. Therefore $Q(4)=2$, and the same for $Q(5)$, $Q(6)$, and $Q(7)$ for a sum of $8$.

For all other $m$ there is one cube in $(1,8]$, $(2,16]$, $(3,24]$, and there are two in $(4,32]$. Therefore, since there are 10 values of $m$ in the sum, this part sums to $10$.

When the partial sums are added, we get $\boxed{059}\hspace{2 mm}QED\hspace{2 mm} \blacksquare$

This solution is brought to you by a1b2

Solution 2

We claim that $Q(m) = 1$ when $m \ge 8$.

When $m \ge 8$, for every $n \ge Q(m) = 1$, we need to prove there exists an integer $k$, such that $n < k^3 \le m \cdot n$.

That's because $\sqrt[3]{m \cdot n} - \sqrt[3]{n} \ge 2\sqrt[3]{n} - \sqrt[3]{n} = \sqrt[3]{n} \ge 1$, so k exists between $\sqrt[3]{m \cdot n}$ and $\sqrt[3]{n}$

$\sqrt[3]{n} < k \le \sqrt[3]{m \cdot n}$.

We can then hand evaluate $Q(m)$ for $m = 2,3,4,5,6,7$, and get $Q(2) = 32$, $Q(3) = 9$, and all the others equal 2.

There are a total of 2010 integers from 8 to 2017.

\[\sum_{m = 2}^{2017} Q(m) \equiv \sum_{m = 2}^{7} Q(m) + 2010 \equiv 32+9+2+2+2+2+10 = \boxed{059} \mod 1000\]

-AlexLikeMath

Solution 3

Note that the problem is just asking for every $m \geq 2$, find the least $n$ such that there lies a perfect cube in between of $n$ and $mn$ for every $n$ after that minimum including the minimum. We consider $m = 2$ first. Then, we need to find the least $n$ such that for every $n$ after this minimum $n$, including the minimum, there lies a perfect cube in between of $n$ and $2n$. Let's denote the range notation as $(n, 2n)$. Hence, we start with $n = 1$ to get the range of $(1, 2)$. Clearly, no perfect cube lies between these numbers. Then we go to $n = 2$ to get $(2, 4)$ and here also nothing works. We can see that the perfect cubes are $1, 8, 27 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000, ...$. Because $1$ can't lie between two positive integers, we need to find the minimum $n$ such that $8$ is between $n$ and $2n$. Clearly, $n = 4$ will yield this case. We have the range $(4, 8)$. This works. We now list every $n$ starting from $4$ and see if all of these ranges host a perfect cube in between them. We have $(5, 10)$ works, $(6, 12)$ works $(7, 14)$ works, but $(8, 16)$ doesn't work. This is because the next perfect cube has to be $27$. Aha! Now we see the case. If we have a range in the following form $(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})$, this will clearly host a perfect cube between them which is $a^{3}$. But as we keep going, we need to put the next perfect cube after $a^{3}$ into the range which is $(a + 1)^{3}$. We know that the next range after $(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})$ is just $(a^{3}, 2a^{3})$ because we double everything. Hence, $(a + 1)^{3}$ must be in this range. If the perfect cube in between $a^{3}$ and $2a^{3}$ is of the form $a^{3} + \alpha$, we know that this added constant $\alpha$ is greater than or equal to $(a + 1)^{3} - a^{3} = 3a^{2} + 3a + 1$. Hence, we let $\alpha = a$ to solve $a^{3} \geq 3a^{2} + 3a + 1$ and for integer solutions, we claim the answer is $a \geq 4$. We can prove this by induction.

Claim: $a^{3} \geq 3a^{2} + 3a + 1$ for integer solutions exists when $a \geq 4$.

Proof: Let's plug in $a = 4$ for our base case. We get: $64 \geq 48 + 12 + 1 = 61$ which holds true. Hence, the inductive hypothesis is that $(a + 1)^{3} \geq 3(a + 1)^{2} + 3(a + 1) + 1$ for all $a \geq 3$. In fact, we simplify to prove $a^{3} \geq 6a + 6$ for all $a \geq 3$. Now, from our inductive assumption, we need to prove that $3a^{2} + 3a + 1 \geq 6a + 6$. Hence, $3a^{2} - 3a \geq 5$ for all $a \geq 3$. Hence, we need to show $a^{2} - a \geq \frac{5}{3}$ for all $a \geq 3$. But since we're proving this in the integer world, this is equivalent to proving that $a^{2} -a \geq 2$ for all $a \geq 3$. Now we need to show that $a^{2} \geq a + 2$. Dividing by $a$ because $a$ is a positive integer means we have to show $a \geq 1 + \frac{2}{a}$. Now since $a \geq 3$, $\frac{2}{a} < 1$ and so the $RHS$ of the inequality can't even exceed $2$ whereas the $LHS$ of the inequality is already exceeding $2$. Therefore, the inductive hypothesis holds true and we are done.

What we have just shown now is that $a \geq 4$. Now note that the minimum range we found that worked was $(\frac{a^{3}}{2}, a^{3})$ where $n = \frac{a^{3}}{2}$. We plug in $a = 4$ to get $n = 32$ and hence $Q(2) = 32$. We can now apply the same procedure to the other numbers and finish as the above solutions.

~ilikemath247365

See Also

2017 AIME I (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 12
Followed by
Problem 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. AMC Logo.png