Difference between revisions of "2020 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 24"
 (→Solution 5)  | 
				 (→Solution 5)  | 
				||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Solution 5==  | ==Solution 5==  | ||
| − | You can first find that n must be congruent to <math>6\equiv0\pmod {21}</math> and <math>57\equiv0\pmod {60}</math>. The we can find that <math>n=21x+6</math> and <math>n=60y+57</math>, where x and y are integers. Then we can find that y must be odd, since if it was even the gcd will be 120, not 60. Also, the unit digit of n has to be 7, since the unit digit of 60y is always 0 and the unit digit of 57 is 7. Therefore, you can find that x must end in 1 to satisfy n having a unit digit of 7. Also, you can find that x must not be a multiple of three or else the gcd will be 63. Therefore, you can test values for x and you can find that x=91 satisfies all these conditions.Therefore, n is 1917 and <math>1+9+1+7 = \boxed{\textbf{(C )} 18}</math>.-happykeeper  | + | You can first find that n must be congruent to <math>6\equiv0\pmod {21}</math> and <math>57\equiv0\pmod {60}</math>. The we can find that <math>n=21x+6</math> and <math>n=60y+57</math>, where x and y are integers. Then we can find that y must be odd, since if it was even the gcd will be 120, not 60. Also, the unit digit of n has to be 7, since the unit digit of 60y is always 0 and the unit digit of 57 is 7. Therefore, you can find that x must end in 1 to satisfy n having a unit digit of 7. Also, you can find that x must not be a multiple of three or else the gcd will be 63. Therefore, you can test values for x and you can find that x=91 satisfies all these conditions.Therefore, n is 1917 and <math>1+9+1+7 = \boxed{\textbf{(C)} 18}</math>.-happykeeper  | 
==Solution 6 (Reverse Euclidean Algorithm)==  | ==Solution 6 (Reverse Euclidean Algorithm)==  | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 22 December 2020
Contents
Problem
Let 
 be the least positive integer greater than 
 for which
What is the sum of the digits of 
?
Solution 1
We know that 
, so we can write 
. Simplifying, we get 
. Similarly, we can write 
, or 
. Solving these two modular congruences, 
 which we know is the only solution by CRT (Chinese Remainder Theorem used to so,be a system of MODULAR CONGURENCES). Now, since the problem is asking for the least positive integer greater than 
, we find the least solution is 
. However, we are have not considered cases where 
 or 
. 
 so we try 
. 
 so again we add 
 to 
. It turns out that 
 does indeed satisfy the original conditions, so our answer is 
.
Solution 2 (bashing)
We are given that 
 and 
. This tells us that 
 is divisible by 
 but not 
. It also tells us that 
 is divisible by 60 but not 120. Starting, we find the least value of 
 which is divisible by 
 which satisfies the conditions for 
, which is 
, making 
. We then now keep on adding 
 until we get a number which satisfies the second equation. This number turns out to be 
, whose digits add up to 
.
-Midnight
Solution 3 (bashing but worse)
Assume that 
 has 4 digits. Then 
, where 
, 
, 
, 
 represent digits of the number (not to get confused with 
). As given the problem, 
 and 
. So we know that 
 (last digit of 
). That means that 
 and 
. We can bash this after this. We just want to find all pairs of numbers 
 such that 
 is a multiple of 7 that is 
 greater than a multiple of 
. Our equation for 
 would be 
 and our equation for 
 would be 
, where 
 is any integer. We plug this value in until we get a value of 
 that makes 
 satisfy the original problem statement (remember, 
). After bashing for hopefully a couple minutes, we find that 
 works. So 
 which means that the sum of its digits is 
.
~ Baolan
Solution 4
The conditions of the problem reduce to the following. 
 where 
 and 
 where 
. From these equations, we see that 
. Solving this diophantine equation gives us that 
, 
 form. Since, 
 is greater than 
, we can do some bounding and get that 
 and 
. Now we start the bash by plugging in numbers that satisfy these conditions. We get 
, 
. So the answer is 
.
Edited by ~fastnfurious1
Solution 5
You can first find that n must be congruent to 
 and 
. The we can find that 
 and 
, where x and y are integers. Then we can find that y must be odd, since if it was even the gcd will be 120, not 60. Also, the unit digit of n has to be 7, since the unit digit of 60y is always 0 and the unit digit of 57 is 7. Therefore, you can find that x must end in 1 to satisfy n having a unit digit of 7. Also, you can find that x must not be a multiple of three or else the gcd will be 63. Therefore, you can test values for x and you can find that x=91 satisfies all these conditions.Therefore, n is 1917 and 
.-happykeeper
Solution 6 (Reverse Euclidean Algorithm)
We are given that 
 and 
 By applying the Euclidean algorithm, but in reverse, we have 
 and 
We now know that 
 must be divisible by 
 and 
 so it is divisible by 
 Therefore, 
 for some integer 
 We know that 
 or else the first condition won't hold (
 will be 
) and 
 or else the second condition won't hold (
 will be 
). Since 
 gives us too small of an answer, then 
 so the answer is 
Solution 7
 tells us 
. The smallest 
 that satisfies the previous condition and 
 is 
, so we start from there. If 
, then 
. Because 
, 
 or 
. We see that 
, which does not fulfill the requirement for 
, so we continue by keep on adding 
 to 
, in order to also fulfill the requirement for 
. Soon, we see that 
 decreases by 
 every time we add 
, so we can quickly see that 
 because at that point 
. Adding up all the digits in 
, we have 
.
-SmileKat32
Solution 8
We are able to set-up the following system-of-congruences: 
 
 
Therefore, by definition, we are able to set-up the following system of equations: 
 
 
Thus, 
We know 
 and since 
 therefore 
 Simplifying this congruence further, we have 
Thus, by definition, 
 Substituting this back into our original equation, 
By definition, we are able to set-up the following congruence:
Thus, 
, so our answer is simply 
.
(Remarks. 
 since 
 by definition & 
 since 
 by definition. 
Remember,  
Lastly, the reason why 
 is 
 would be divisible by 
, which is not possible due to the certain condition.) 
~ nikenissan
Solution 9
First, we find 
. We know that it is greater than 
, so we first input 
. From the first equation, 
, we know that if 
 is correct, after we add 
 to it, it should be divisible by 
, but not 
. 
Uh oh. To get to the nearest number divisible by 
, we have to add 
 to cancel out the remainder. (Note that we don't subtract 
 to get to 
; 
 is already at its lowest possible value!)
Adding 
 to 
 gives us 
. (Note: 
 is currently divisible by 63, but that's fine since we'll be changing it in the next step.)
Now using, the second equation, 
, we know that if 
 is correct, after we add 
 to it, it should be divisible by 
, but not 
.
Uh oh (again). This requires some guessing and checking. We can add 
 over and over again until 
 is valid. This changes 
 while also maintaining that 
 has no remainders. 
After adding 
 once, we get 
. By pure luck, adding 
 two more times gives us 
 with no remainders. 
We now have 
. However, this number is divisible by 
. To get the next possible number, we add the LCM of 
 and 
 (once again, to maintain divisibility), which is 
. Unfortunately, 
 is still divisible by 
. Adding 
 again gives us 
, which is valid. However, remember that this is equal to 
, so subtracting 
 from 
 gives us 
, which is 
. 
The sum of its digits are 
.
So, our answer is 
. ~ primegn 
Video Solution
Education The Study of Everything
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdGmSyzR908&list=PLLCzevlMcsWNcTZEaxHe8VaccrhubDOlQ&index=5 ~ MathEx
See Also
| 2020 AMC 10A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 23  | 
Followed by Problem 25  | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
| All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.