Difference between revisions of "2022 AIME I Problems/Problem 6"
Ihatemath123 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | == Problem == |
+ | Find the number of ordered pairs of integers <math>(a, b)</math> such that the sequence<cmath>3, 4, 5, a, b, 30, 40, 50</cmath>is strictly increasing and no set of four (not necessarily consecutive) terms forms an arithmetic progression. | ||
− | + | == Solution == | |
− | + | Since <math>3,4,5,a</math> and <math>3,4,5,b</math> cannot be an arithmetic progression, <math>a</math> or <math>b</math> can never be <math>6</math>. Since <math>b, 30, 40, 50</math> and <math>a, 30, 40, 50</math> cannot be an arithmetic progression, <math>b</math> can never be <math>20</math>. Since <math>a < b</math>, there are <math>{24 - 2 \choose 2} = 231</math> ways to choose <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> with these two restrictions in mind. | |
− | ~ | + | However, there are still specific invalid cases counted in these <math>231</math> pairs <math>(a,b)</math>. Since |
+ | <cmath>3,5,a,b</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (7,9)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>a,b,30,50</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot be an arithmetic progression, so <math>(a,b) \neq (-10,10)</math>; however, since this pair was not counted in our <math>231</math>, we do not need to subtract it off. | ||
+ | <cmath>3,a,b,30</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, so <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (12,21)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>4, a, b, 40</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, so <math>\underline{(a,b) \neq (16,28)}</math>. | ||
+ | <cmath>5, a,b, 50</cmath> | ||
+ | cannot form an arithmetic progression, <math>(a,b) \neq 20, 35</math>; however, since this pair was not counted in our <math>231</math> (since we disallowed <math>a</math> or <math>b</math> to be <math>20</math>), we do not to subtract it off. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, the sequences <math>(3,a,b,40)</math>, <math>(3,a,b,50)</math>, <math>(4,a,b,30)</math>, <math>(4,a,b,50)</math>, <math>(5,a,b,30)</math> and <math>(5,a,b,40)</math> will never be arithmetic, since that would require <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> to be non-integers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, we need to subtract off <math>3</math> progressions from the <math>231</math> we counted, to get our final answer of <math>\boxed{228}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~ ihatemath123 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{AIME box|year=2022|n=I|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 20:45, 17 February 2022
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs of integers such that the sequence
is strictly increasing and no set of four (not necessarily consecutive) terms forms an arithmetic progression.
Solution
Since and
cannot be an arithmetic progression,
or
can never be
. Since
and
cannot be an arithmetic progression,
can never be
. Since
, there are
ways to choose
and
with these two restrictions in mind.
However, there are still specific invalid cases counted in these pairs
. Since
cannot form an arithmetic progression,
.
cannot be an arithmetic progression, so
; however, since this pair was not counted in our
, we do not need to subtract it off.
cannot form an arithmetic progression, so
.
cannot form an arithmetic progression, so
.
cannot form an arithmetic progression,
; however, since this pair was not counted in our
(since we disallowed
or
to be
), we do not to subtract it off.
Also, the sequences ,
,
,
,
and
will never be arithmetic, since that would require
and
to be non-integers.
So, we need to subtract off progressions from the
we counted, to get our final answer of
.
~ ihatemath123
See Also
2022 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.