Difference between revisions of "SANSKAR'S OG PROBLEMS"
(→Solution 1 by ddk001 (Casework)) |
(→Solution 1 by ddk001 (Casework)) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Hence, we must have <math>b=1</math>. | Hence, we must have <math>b=1</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now, with <math>b</math> determined by modular arithmetic, we actually plug in the values. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To simplify future calculations, note that | ||
| + | |||
| + | <cmath>a!=\overline{ab}^2-b!=(10a+1)^2-1=100a^2+20a=10a(a+2)</cmath>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For <math>a=5</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For <math>a=6</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For <math>a=7</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For <math>a=8</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For <math>a=9</math>, this does not hold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hence, there is no positive integers <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> between <math>1</math> and <math>9</math> inclusive such that <math>a!+b!=\overline{ab}^2</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Case 2:<math>a=b</math>''' | ||
==Problem2 == | ==Problem2 == | ||
For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. | For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. | ||
Revision as of 21:27, 28 January 2024
Hi, this page is created by ...~ SANSGANKRSNGUPTA This page contains exclusive problems made by me myself. I am the creator of these OG problems. What OG stands for is a secret! Please post your solutions with your name. If you view this page please increment the below number by one:
Problem 1
Let
be a 2-digit positive integer satisfying
. Find
.
Solution 1 by ddk001 (Casework)
Case 1:
In this case, we have
.
If
, we must have
, but this contradicts the original assumption of
, so hence we must have
.
With this in mind, we consider the unit digit of
.
Subcase 1.1:
In this case, we have that
.
There is no apparent contradiction here, so we leave this as it is.
Subcase 1.2:
In this case, we have that
.
This contradicts with the fact that
, so this is impossible.
Subcase 1.3:
In this case, we have that
.
However, this is impossible for all
.
Subcase 1.4:
In this case, we have that
.
Again, this yields
, which, again, contradicts
.
Hence, we must have
.
Now, with
determined by modular arithmetic, we actually plug in the values.
To simplify future calculations, note that
.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
For
, this does not hold.
Hence, there is no positive integers
and
between
and
inclusive such that
.
Case 2:
Problem2
For any positive integer
,
>1 can
be a perfect square? If yes, give one such
. If no, then prove it.