Difference between revisions of "2002 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
− | {{ | + | We proceed with two parts: |
− | + | ||
+ | ===Part 1: Proof of Inequality=== | ||
+ | We have: | ||
+ | \[ | ||
+ | \sum_{i=1}^{r-1} d_i d_{i+1} = d_1d_2 + d_2d_3 + \cdots + d_{r-1}d_r | ||
+ | \] | ||
+ | For each term \( d_i d_{i+1} \), note that \( d_{i+1} \leq \frac{n}{d_i} \) (since divisors come in pairs). Thus: | ||
+ | \[ | ||
+ | d_i d_{i+1} \leq d_i \cdot \frac{n}{d_i} = n | ||
+ | \] | ||
+ | Summing over all \( r-1 \) terms: | ||
+ | \[ | ||
+ | \sum_{i=1}^{r-1} d_i d_{i+1} \leq (r-1) \cdot n < n^2 | ||
+ | \] | ||
+ | The last inequality holds because \( r \) (the number of divisors) is at most \( 2\sqrt{n} \), making \( (r-1)n \leq 2n^{3/2} < n^2 \) for \( n > 4 \). Smaller cases can be verified directly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Part 2: Equality Condition=== | ||
+ | Equality occurs **only** when \( n \) is prime: | ||
+ | - For prime \( n \), the divisors are \( 1 \) and \( n \), so: | ||
+ | <cmath> d_1d_2 = 1 \cdot n = n < n^2 </cmath> | ||
+ | - For composite \( n \), there exists at least one additional divisor \( d_2 \) (where \( 1 < d_2 < n \)), making the sum strictly larger than \( n \) but still less than \( n^2 \). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{INO box|year=2002|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=2002|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{IMO box|year=2002|num-b=3|num-a=5}} |
Latest revision as of 10:22, 24 April 2025
Problem:
Let be an integer and let
be all of its positive divisors in increasing order. Show that
Solution
We proceed with two parts:
Part 1: Proof of Inequality
We have: \[ \sum_{i=1}^{r-1} d_i d_{i+1} = d_1d_2 + d_2d_3 + \cdots + d_{r-1}d_r \] For each term \( d_i d_{i+1} \), note that \( d_{i+1} \leq \frac{n}{d_i} \) (since divisors come in pairs). Thus: \[ d_i d_{i+1} \leq d_i \cdot \frac{n}{d_i} = n \] Summing over all \( r-1 \) terms: \[ \sum_{i=1}^{r-1} d_i d_{i+1} \leq (r-1) \cdot n < n^2 \] The last inequality holds because \( r \) (the number of divisors) is at most \( 2\sqrt{n} \), making \( (r-1)n \leq 2n^{3/2} < n^2 \) for \( n > 4 \). Smaller cases can be verified directly.
Part 2: Equality Condition
Equality occurs **only** when \( n \) is prime: - For prime \( n \), the divisors are \( 1 \) and \( n \), so:
- For composite \( n \), there exists at least one additional divisor \( d_2 \) (where \( 1 < d_2 < n \)), making the sum strictly larger than \( n \) but still less than \( n^2 \).
See Also
2002 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |