Difference between revisions of "2009 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Problem) |
(Added two solutions) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
''Authors: Jan Vonk and Peter Vandendriessche, Belgium, and Hojoo Lee, South Korea'' | ''Authors: Jan Vonk and Peter Vandendriessche, Belgium, and Hojoo Lee, South Korea'' | ||
− | ==Solution== | + | ==Solution 1== |
− | {{ | + | Extend <math>CK</math> to meet <math>BE</math> at <math>I</math>. Then, we can see that <math>I</math> is the incenter of <math>\triangle ABC</math>, so <math>IM=ID</math>, where <math>M</math> is the intersection of the incircle with <math>\overline{AC}</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>CI</math> bisects <math>\angle ACB</math>, we have <math>\triangle IDC \cong \triangle IMC</math>, so <math>\angle IMK = \angle IDK = 45^\circ</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | From here, there are two possibilities: either <math>M</math> and <math>E</math> coincide or they don't. If <math>M</math> and <math>E</math> coincide, then <math>BM</math> is the median and the altitude from <math>B</math>, so <math>BC = AB</math>, and therefore <math>\triangle ABC</math> is equilateral, so <math>\angle BAC = 60^\circ</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Otherwise, we have <math>MIKE</math> is cyclic, and <math>\angle IME = 90^\circ</math>, so <math>IE</math> is the diameter of <math>(MIKE)</math>, so <math>\angle IKE = 90^\circ</math> and <math>\angle KIE = 45^\circ</math>. Also, <math>\angle BIC = 180^\circ - \angle KIE = 135^\circ</math>, so <math>2x = 45^\circ</math>, so <math>\angle CAB = 180^\circ = 4x = 90^\circ</math>, which is the second possible value of <math>\angle CAB</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:2009_IMO_P4_(1).png]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will be using the trig bash solution given in EGMO. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>I</math> be the incenter, and set <math>\angle DAC = 2x</math> with <math>0 < x < 45</math>. From <math>\angle AIE = \angle DIC</math>, it is easy to compute <cmath>\angle KIE = 90^\circ - 2x, \quad \angle ECI = 45^\circ - x, \quad \angle IEK = 45^\circ, \quad \angle KEC = 3x.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, by LoS, we have <cmath>\dfrac{IK}{KC} = \dfrac{\sin 45^\circ \cdot \frac{EK}{\sin(90^\circ - 2x)}}{\sin(3x) \cdot \frac{EK}{\sin(45^\circ-x)}} = \frac{\sin 45^\circ \sin(45^\circ - x)}{\sin(3x) \sin(90^\circ-2x)}.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, by the angle bisector theorem on <math>\triangle IDC</math>, we get <cmath>\dfrac{IK}{KC} = \dfrac{ID}{DC} = \frac{\sin(45^\circ-x)}{\sin(45^\circ+x)}.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Equating the above two equations and cancelling <math>\sin(45^\circ-x)</math>, we get <cmath>\sin 45^\circ \sin(45^\circ+x)=\sin 3x \sin(90^\circ - 2x).</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Applying product to sum, we get <cmath>\cos(x)-\cos(90^\circ+x) = \cos(5x-90^\circ)-\cos(90^\circ+x),</cmath> | ||
+ | or simply <math>\cos x = \cos(5x-90^\circ)</math>. Then, applying difference to product, we get <cmath>0 = \cos(5x-90^\circ)-\cos x = 2 \sin(3x-45^\circ) \sin(2x-45^\circ).</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, we get two cases: <math>\sin(3x-45^\circ) = 0</math> or <math>\sin(2x-45^\circ) = 0</math>. Note that these hold iff the expressions inside the sines are multiples of <math>180^\circ</math>. Using the bound <math>0 < x < 45</math>, we can easily get that the only possible values are <math>x = 15^\circ</math> and <math>x = \frac{45}{2}^\circ</math>, so <math>\angle A = 60^\circ, 90^\circ</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:2009_IMO_P4_(2).png]] | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=2009|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{IMO box|year=2009|num-b=3|num-a=5}} |
Latest revision as of 02:29, 22 July 2025
Contents
Problem
Let be a triangle with
. The angle bisectors of
and
meet the sides
and
at
and
, respectively. Let
be the incenter of triangle
. Suppose that
. Find all possible values of
.
Authors: Jan Vonk and Peter Vandendriessche, Belgium, and Hojoo Lee, South Korea
Solution 1
Extend to meet
at
. Then, we can see that
is the incenter of
, so
, where
is the intersection of the incircle with
.
Since bisects
, we have
, so
.
From here, there are two possibilities: either and
coincide or they don't. If
and
coincide, then
is the median and the altitude from
, so
, and therefore
is equilateral, so
.
Otherwise, we have is cyclic, and
, so
is the diameter of
, so
and
. Also,
, so
, so
, which is the second possible value of
.
Solution 2
We will be using the trig bash solution given in EGMO.
Let be the incenter, and set
with
. From
, it is easy to compute
Then, by LoS, we have
Also, by the angle bisector theorem on , we get
Equating the above two equations and cancelling , we get
Applying product to sum, we get
or simply
. Then, applying difference to product, we get
Then, we get two cases: or
. Note that these hold iff the expressions inside the sines are multiples of
. Using the bound
, we can easily get that the only possible values are
and
, so
.
See Also
2009 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |