Difference between revisions of "1967 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
m |
|||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
This is true because <math>0 < x \le 1</math>, and <math>-x^2 - x + 3 \ge 0</math> on this interval. | This is true because <math>0 < x \le 1</math>, and <math>-x^2 - x + 3 \ge 0</math> on this interval. | ||
− | Note | + | ===Note=== |
− | are equalities. This is the case when all sides except <math> | + | |
+ | <math>V = \frac{1}{8}</math> is achieved when <math>x = 1</math> and all inequalities | ||
+ | are equalities. This is the case when all sides except <math>CD</math> are <math>= 1</math>, | ||
<math>P, R</math> are midpoints of <math>AB</math> and <math>Q = P</math> (in which case the planes | <math>P, R</math> are midpoints of <math>AB</math> and <math>Q = P</math> (in which case the planes | ||
− | <math>ABC, ABD</math> are perpendicular). In this case, <math> | + | <math>ABC, ABD</math> are perpendicular). In this case, <math>CD = \frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}</math>, |
as can be seen from an easy computation. | as can be seen from an easy computation. | ||
Line 102: | Line 104: | ||
are equal to the corresponding edges of <math>T</math>, <math>\mathbf{unless}</math> the | are equal to the corresponding edges of <math>T</math>, <math>\mathbf{unless}</math> the | ||
edge <math>e_1</math> stretches between sides of <math>T</math> which are perpendicular. | edge <math>e_1</math> stretches between sides of <math>T</math> which are perpendicular. | ||
+ | When we chose a bigger <math>f_1</math>, if <math>e_1 < 1</math> we can choose <math>f_1 = 1</math>. | ||
+ | Or, we can choose <math>f_1</math> such that it stretches between sides which | ||
+ | are perpendicular. | ||
+ | |||
+ | (By "stretches between two sides" I mean that the end points of the | ||
+ | edge are the vertices on the two sides which are not common to the | ||
+ | two sides. In the picture above, <math>DC_2</math> stretches between the sides | ||
+ | <math>ABD, AC_2B</math> of <math>ABC_2D</math>.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Lemma=== | ||
− | + | Assume we have a tetrahedron <math>T</math> with edges <math>e_1, \dots, e_6</math>, such | |
− | + | that <math>e_2, \dots, e_6 \le 1</math>. If there is an edge <math>e_m < 1</math> among | |
− | + | <math>e_2, \dots, e_6</math> then there is a tetrahedron <math>U</math> with volume bigger | |
+ | than the volume of <math>T</math>, whose edges are equal to those of <math>T</math>, | ||
+ | except for <math>e_m</math>, which is replaced by an edge of size <math>1</math>. | ||
− | + | ===Proof=== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Case 1: If <math>T</math> does not have any sides which are perpendicular, then | Case 1: If <math>T</math> does not have any sides which are perpendicular, then | ||
− | the existence of <math> | + | the existence of <math>U</math> follows from the corollary. |
− | Case 2: Assume <math>T</math> has two sides which are perpendicular (like <math>ABC_2D</math> | + | Case 2: Assume <math>T</math> has exactly two sides which are perpendicular |
− | in the picture above). If | + | (like <math>ABC_2D</math> in the picture above). If <math>C_2D</math> were the only adge |
− | then | + | <math>< 1</math>, then all the other edges are <math>= 1</math> (because they were assumed |
− | <math> | + | to be <math>\le 1</math>). In this case <math>\triangle ABD, \triangle AC_2B</math> are |
− | <math>\triangle ABD, \triangle AC_2B</math> are equilateral with sides <math>= 1</math>, and | + | equilateral with sides <math>= 1</math>, and the planes can not be perpendicular |
− | the planes can not be perpendicular since <math>C_2D < 1</math>. | + | since <math>C_2D < 1</math>. So <math>e_m</math> must be one of the other sides. Then |
+ | again, the existence of <math>U</math> follows from the corollary. | ||
Case 3: Assume that three sides are perpendicular. | Case 3: Assume that three sides are perpendicular. | ||
Line 128: | Line 138: | ||
[[File:Prob_1967_2_fig3.png|600px]] | [[File:Prob_1967_2_fig3.png|600px]] | ||
− | Assume each pair of the planes meeting at <math>A</math> are perpendicular. Since | + | Assume the perpendicular sides are the ones meeting at <math>A</math>, i.e. |
+ | each pair of the planes meeting at <math>A</math> are perpendicular. Since | ||
at least two of the edges <math>BD, BC, CD \le 1</math> it follows that | at least two of the edges <math>BD, BC, CD \le 1</math> it follows that | ||
− | <math>AB, AC, AD < 1</math> (the sides of the right angle in a right triangle are | + | <math>AB, AC, AD < 1</math> (the sides of the right angle in a right triangle |
− | less than the hypotenuse). | + | are less than the hypotenuse). Just for the sake of notation, |
− | tetrahedron <math> | + | assume <math>e_m = AB < 1</math>. We can apply the corollary, and find a |
− | equal to those of <math>T</math>, except that <math>AB</math> is replaced by | + | tetrahedron <math>U</math> with volume bigger than the volume of <math>T</math>, with |
− | + | edges equal to those of <math>T</math>, except that <math>AB</math> is replaced by an | |
− | + | edge <math>= 1</math>. | |
− | |||
+ | Now the problem is very easy to prove. Pick a tetrahedron <math>T</math> | ||
+ | with edges <math>e_1, \dots, e_6</math>, such that <math>e_2, \dots, e_6 \le 1</math>. | ||
+ | (To obtain this, take any acute tetrahedron, and scale it down | ||
+ | as needed until five edges are <math>\le 1</math>.) Apply the lemma as | ||
+ | many times as necessary (up to five times), successively | ||
+ | replacing each edge <math>< 1</math> by an edge <math>= 1</math>. We obtain a | ||
+ | tetrahedron <math>U</math> with five edges <math>= 1</math>, and one edge <math>f_1 = e_1</math>. | ||
+ | If <math>f_1</math> stretches between two perpendicular sides, we are done. | ||
+ | If not, apply the corollary one more time to obtain a bigger | ||
+ | tetrahedron in which <math>f_1</math> is replaced by a larger edge which | ||
+ | stretches between two perpendicular sides. | ||
+ | We obtain the same result as in the first solution: the largest | ||
+ | tetrahedron is the one formed by two equilateral triangles with | ||
+ | sides <math>= 1</math>, having one side in common, with the two planes | ||
+ | containing the triangles perpendicular. An easy calculation | ||
+ | shows that the edge which is <math>> 1</math> is in fact of length | ||
+ | <math>\frac{\sqrt{6}}{2}</math>, and the volume of this tetrahedron | ||
+ | is <math>\frac{1}{8}</math>. | ||
(Solution by pf02, September 2024) | (Solution by pf02, September 2024) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Revision as of 00:40, 15 September 2024
Prove that if one and only one edge of a tetrahedron is greater than ,
then its volume is
.
Contents
Solution
Assume and let
. Let
be the feet of perpendicular from
to
and
and from
to
, respectively.
Suppose . We have that
,
. We also have
. So the volume of the tetrahedron is
.
We want to prove that this value is at most , which is equivalent to
. This is true because
.
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by jgnr. The original thread can be found here: [1]
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
The solution above is essentially correct, and it is nice, but it is so sloppily written that it borders the incomprehensible. Below I will give an edited version of it for the sake of completeness.
Then, I will give a second solution to the problem.
A few notes which may be of interest.
The condition that one side is greater than is not really
necessary. The statement is true even if all sides are
.
What we need is that no more than one side is
.
The upper limit of for the volume of the tetrahedron
is actually reached. This will become clear from both solutions.
Solution
Assume and assume that all other sides are
.
Let
. Let
be the feet of perpendiculars from
to
, from
to the plane
, and from
to
,
respectively.
At least one of the segments has to be
.
Suppose
. (If
were bigger that
the argument would be the same.) We have that
. By the same
argument in
we have
.
Since
plane
, we have
, so
.
The volume of the tetrahedron is
area of
(height from
.
We need to prove that .
Some simple computations show that this is the same as
.
This is true because
, and
on this interval.
Note
is achieved when
and all inequalities
are equalities. This is the case when all sides except
are
,
are midpoints of
and
(in which case the planes
are perpendicular). In this case,
,
as can be seen from an easy computation.
Solution 2
We begin with two simple propositions.
Proposition
Let be a tetrahedron, and consider the transformations which
rotate
around
while keeping
fixed. We get a set of tetrahedrons, two of which,
and
are shown in the picture below. The lengths of all sides
except
are constant through this transformation.
1. Assume that the angles between the planes and
, and
and
are both acute. If the perpendicular from
to the
plane
is larger that the perpendicular from
to the plane
then the volume of
is larger than the volume of
.
2. Furthermore, the tetrahedron obtained when the position of
is such that the planes
and
are perpendicular has
the maximum volume of all tetrahedrons obtained from rotating
around
.
These statements are intuitively clear, since the volume of the
tetrahedron
is given by
area of
height from
.
A formal proof is very easy, and I will skip it.
Corollary
Given a tetrahedron , and an edge
of it, we can find another
tetrahedron
such that
,
with an edge
, and such that all the other edges of
are equal to the corresponding edges of
,
the
edge
stretches between sides of
which are perpendicular.
When we chose a bigger
, if
we can choose
.
Or, we can choose
such that it stretches between sides which
are perpendicular.
(By "stretches between two sides" I mean that the end points of the
edge are the vertices on the two sides which are not common to the
two sides. In the picture above, stretches between the sides
of
.)
Lemma
Assume we have a tetrahedron with edges
, such
that
. If there is an edge
among
then there is a tetrahedron
with volume bigger
than the volume of
, whose edges are equal to those of
,
except for
, which is replaced by an edge of size
.
Proof
Case 1: If does not have any sides which are perpendicular, then
the existence of
follows from the corollary.
Case 2: Assume has exactly two sides which are perpendicular
(like
in the picture above). If
were the only adge
, then all the other edges are
(because they were assumed
to be
). In this case
are
equilateral with sides
, and the planes can not be perpendicular
since
. So
must be one of the other sides. Then
again, the existence of
follows from the corollary.
Case 3: Assume that three sides are perpendicular.
Assume the perpendicular sides are the ones meeting at , i.e.
each pair of the planes meeting at
are perpendicular. Since
at least two of the edges
it follows that
(the sides of the right angle in a right triangle
are less than the hypotenuse). Just for the sake of notation,
assume
. We can apply the corollary, and find a
tetrahedron
with volume bigger than the volume of
, with
edges equal to those of
, except that
is replaced by an
edge
.
Now the problem is very easy to prove. Pick a tetrahedron
with edges
, such that
.
(To obtain this, take any acute tetrahedron, and scale it down
as needed until five edges are
.) Apply the lemma as
many times as necessary (up to five times), successively
replacing each edge
by an edge
. We obtain a
tetrahedron
with five edges
, and one edge
.
If
stretches between two perpendicular sides, we are done.
If not, apply the corollary one more time to obtain a bigger
tetrahedron in which
is replaced by a larger edge which
stretches between two perpendicular sides.
We obtain the same result as in the first solution: the largest
tetrahedron is the one formed by two equilateral triangles with
sides , having one side in common, with the two planes
containing the triangles perpendicular. An easy calculation
shows that the edge which is
is in fact of length
, and the volume of this tetrahedron
is
.
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
See Also
1967 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |