Difference between revisions of "Wilson's Theorem"
m |
(→Example Problem utilizing Wilson's) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Finally, multiply this equality by <math>p-1</math> to complete the proof. | Finally, multiply this equality by <math>p-1</math> to complete the proof. | ||
| − | ==Example | + | ==Example== |
| − | < | + | Let <math>{p}</math> be a prime number such that dividing <math>{p}<math> by 4 leaves the remainder 1. Show that there is an integer <math>{n}</math> such that <math>n^2+1</math> is divisible by <math>{p}</math>. |
| + | <Solutions?> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 17 June 2006
Contents
Statement
If and only if
is a prime, then
is a multiple of
. In other words
.
Proof
Wilson's theorem is easily verifiable for 2 and 3, so let's consider
. If
is composite, then its positive factors are among
. Hence,
, so
.
However if
is prime, then each of the above integers are relatively prime to
. So for each of these integers a there is another
such that
. It is important to note that this
is unique modulo
, and that since
is prime,
if and only if
is
or
. Now if we omit 1 and
, then the others can be grouped into pairs whose product is congruent to one,
Finally, multiply this equality by
to complete the proof.
Example
Let
be a prime number such that dividing
such that
is divisible by
.
<Solutions?>