Difference between revisions of "2025 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Mathcosine (talk | contribs) (→Video Solution) |
Mathcosine (talk | contribs) (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
\text{Claim: One of the } n \text{ lines must be } x=1, y=1, \text{ or } x+y=n. | \text{Claim: One of the } n \text{ lines must be } x=1, y=1, \text{ or } x+y=n. | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
− | \ | + | \Proof: Assume for the sake of contradiction not. Then, the following holds: |
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
\quad \text{1. } x=1 \text{ is not in our lines.} | \quad \text{1. } x=1 \text{ is not in our lines.} | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
− | + | Otherwise, two points with <math>x=1</math> are on the same line. This implies that each point with <math>x</math>-coordinate <math>1</math> must lie on distinct lines, hence there exists a bijection between the lines and points with <math>x</math>-coordinate <math>1</math>. It follows with similar reasoning that: | |
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
\quad \text{2. Lines are bijective with points with } y \text{-coordinate.} | \quad \text{2. Lines are bijective with points with } y \text{-coordinate.} | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
For <math>n=3</math>, we have possibilities <math>k=0, k=1, \text{ or } k=3</math>. By our induction above, we conclude that for any <math>n</math>, the possible <math>k</math> is a subset of <math>\{0,1,3\}</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | For <math>n=3</math>, we have possibilities <math>k=0, k=1, \text{ or } k=3</math>. By our induction above, we conclude that for any <math>n</math>, the possible <math>k</math> is a subset of <math>\{0,1,3\}</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | ~MC | ||
== Video Solution == | == Video Solution == |
Revision as of 20:45, 16 July 2025
A line in the plane is called sunny if it is not parallel to any of the –axis, the
–axis, or the line
.
Let be a given integer. Determine all nonnegative integers
such that there exist
distinct lines in the plane satisfying both of the following:
- For all positive integers
and
with
, the point
lies on at least one of the lines; and
- Exactly
of the
lines are sunny.
Solution 1
Consider a valid construction for .
\Proof: Assume for the sake of contradiction not. Then, the following holds:
Otherwise, two points with
are on the same line. This implies that each point with
-coordinate
must lie on distinct lines, hence there exists a bijection between the lines and points with
-coordinate
. It follows with similar reasoning that:
Consider the points on
that are not
or
. Then, because there exists a bijection, any such point must have a line through a point with
-coordinate
and
-coordinate
that are not
or
(otherwise
exists). But this cannot be possible if the point is not
. Since
, by the Pigeonhole Principle there must be at least
point that has to pass through this condition, hence we have proved the claim.
---
Hence, remove one of the or
lines. We then get a valid covering for
with the same number of sunny lines! Thus, any possible number of sunny lines for
must be possible for
.
For
, we have possibilities
. By our induction above, we conclude that for any
, the possible
is a subset of
.
~MC
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJVQqugw_JI [includes motivational discussion]
https://youtu.be/4K6wbEuNooI [includes exploration to show motivation behind arguement]