Difference between revisions of "2025 SSMO Speed Round Problems/Problem 10"
(Created page with "==Problem== Let <math>p</math> be a quadratic with a positive leading coefficient, and let <math>r</math> be a real number satisfying <math>r < 1 < \tfrac{5}{2r} < 5</math>....") |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that any fixed point of <math>p(x)</math> is also a fixed point of <math>p(p(x))</math>. From the condition that <math>p(p(x)) = x</math> for <math>x\in \{r,1,\tfrac{5}{2r},5\}</math>, we can conclude two things: | ||
+ | <UL> | ||
+ | <LI>The fixed points of <math>p</math> are a subset of <math>\{r,1,\tfrac{5}{2r},5\}</math>;</LI> | ||
+ | <LI><math>p</math> has <math>0</math>, <math>2</math>, or <math>4</math> fixed points.</LI> | ||
+ | </UL> | ||
+ | The main claim is that <math>p</math> has exactly <math>2</math> fixed points, and that these fixed points are <math>1</math> and <math>5</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, we prove that <math>p</math> has exactly two fixed points. It is impossible that <math>p</math> has <math>4</math> fixed points because that would imply <math>\deg p \ge 4</math>. It is also impossible that <math>p</math> has <math>0</math> fixed points. For the sake of contradiction, suppose that this is the case. Then, the parabola <math>y=p(x)</math> does not intersect the line <math>y=x</math>, and since <math>p</math> has a positive leading coefficient, the parabola <math>y=p(x)</math> lies entirely above the line <math>y=x</math>. Since <math>p</math> has no fixed points, the points <math>(1, p(1))</math> and <math>(p(1), p(p(1))) = (p(1),1)</math> are distinct and lie on opposite sides of the line <math>y=x</math>. However, both of these points lie on the parabola <math>y=p(x)</math>, which is a contradiction. Thus, <math>p</math> has exactly <math>2</math> fixed points. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <asy> | ||
+ | unitsize(0.27cm); | ||
+ | |||
+ | import contour; | ||
+ | real f(real x, real y) { return 0.3x^2-y; } | ||
+ | guide[][] thegraphs = contour(f, | ||
+ | a=(-20,-20), b=(20,20), new real[] {0}); | ||
+ | draw(thegraphs[0],blue); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw((-9,-5)--(12,16),Arrows); | ||
+ | |||
+ | pair A,B,C,D; | ||
+ | |||
+ | B=(-2.3472,1.6528); | ||
+ | D=(5.68053,9.68053); | ||
+ | A=(-3.92744,4.62744); | ||
+ | C=(0.59411,0.10589); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw((-2.3472,-7)--(-2.3472,25),red+dashed); | ||
+ | draw((5.68053,-7)--(5.68053,25),red+dashed); | ||
+ | |||
+ | dot(A); | ||
+ | dot(B); | ||
+ | dot(C); | ||
+ | dot(D); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$y=x$",(-9,-2.5)); | ||
+ | label("$y=p(x)$",(-11,18)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$(c,d)$",(-5.82744,4.62744)); | ||
+ | label("$(a,a)$",(-4.4472,1.7528)); | ||
+ | label("$(d,c)$",(0.59411,-1.10589)); | ||
+ | label("$(b,b)$",(7.28053,8.78053)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$x=a$",(-4.8472,23)); | ||
+ | label("$x=b$",(3.28053,23.2)); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, we show that the fixed points of <math>p</math> are <math>1</math> and <math>5</math>. Let <math>(a,b,c,d)</math> be a permutation of <math>(r,1,\tfrac{5}{2r},5)</math>, and suppose that <math>p(a)=a</math>, <math>p(b)=b</math>, <math>p(c)=d</math>, and <math>p(d)=c</math>. WLOG, suppose <math>a<b</math>. We first note that a point on <math>y=p(x)</math> lies under the line <math>y=x</math> if and only if it lies between the lines <math>x = a</math> and <math>x=b</math>. WLOG, suppose <math>a<d<b</math>. Since <math>(d,c)</math> lies under the line <math>y=x</math>, we have <math>c<d</math>. Notice that <math>(c,d)</math> cannot lie between <math>x=a</math> and <math>x=b</math> because exactly one of the points <math>(c,d)</math> and <math>(d,c)</math> lies below <math>y=x</math>. Since <math>c<d</math>, it follows that <math>c<a<d<b</math>, so <math>(a,b,c,d) = (1,5,r,\tfrac{5}{2r})</math>. Thus, <math>p(1)=1</math> and <math>p(5)=5</math>, as desired. | ||
+ | |||
+ | All that is left to do is to determine the leading coefficient of <math>p</math>, which we call <math>m</math>. We now know that <math>p(x) = m(x-1)(x-5) + x</math>. For convenience, replace <math>r</math> and <math>\tfrac{5}{2r}</math> by <math>s</math> and <math>t</math>, respectively, satisfying <math>st=\tfrac{5}{2}</math>. We have\begin{align*} t &= ms^2 - (6m-1)s + 5m \\ s &= mt^2 - (6m-1)t + 5m.\end{align*}Adding these two equations gives us <math>6m(s+t) = m(s^2+t^2) + 10m</math>. Dividing through by <math>m</math> and using <math>s^2+t^2 = (s+t)^2 - 2st = (s+t)^2 - 5</math>, we find that <math>s+t=1</math> or <math>s+t=5</math>. Since <math>t>1</math> and <math>s>0</math>, we must have <math>s+t=5</math>. Then, subtracting the second centered equation from the first and rearranging gives us <math>t-s + m(t^2-s^2) = (6m-1)(t-s)</math>. As <math>s\ne t</math>, we may divide through by <math>t-s</math> to obtain <math>1 + m(s+t) = 1+5m = 6m-1</math>. Finally, we have <math>m=2</math>, which gives <math>p(x) = 2x^2 - 11x + 10</math>. The answer is <math>2(12)^2 - 11(12)+10 = \boxed{166}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Sedro |
Latest revision as of 19:29, 12 September 2025
Problem
Let be a quadratic with a positive leading coefficient, and let
be a real number satisfying
. Given that
for
, find
.
Solution
Note that any fixed point of is also a fixed point of
. From the condition that
for
, we can conclude two things:
- The fixed points of
are a subset of
;
has
,
, or
fixed points.
The main claim is that has exactly
fixed points, and that these fixed points are
and
.
First, we prove that has exactly two fixed points. It is impossible that
has
fixed points because that would imply
. It is also impossible that
has
fixed points. For the sake of contradiction, suppose that this is the case. Then, the parabola
does not intersect the line
, and since
has a positive leading coefficient, the parabola
lies entirely above the line
. Since
has no fixed points, the points
and
are distinct and lie on opposite sides of the line
. However, both of these points lie on the parabola
, which is a contradiction. Thus,
has exactly
fixed points.
Now, we show that the fixed points of are
and
. Let
be a permutation of
, and suppose that
,
,
, and
. WLOG, suppose
. We first note that a point on
lies under the line
if and only if it lies between the lines
and
. WLOG, suppose
. Since
lies under the line
, we have
. Notice that
cannot lie between
and
because exactly one of the points
and
lies below
. Since
, it follows that
, so
. Thus,
and
, as desired.
All that is left to do is to determine the leading coefficient of , which we call
. We now know that
. For convenience, replace
and
by
and
, respectively, satisfying
. We have\begin{align*} t &= ms^2 - (6m-1)s + 5m \\ s &= mt^2 - (6m-1)t + 5m.\end{align*}Adding these two equations gives us
. Dividing through by
and using
, we find that
or
. Since
and
, we must have
. Then, subtracting the second centered equation from the first and rearranging gives us
. As
, we may divide through by
to obtain
. Finally, we have
, which gives
. The answer is
.
~Sedro