Difference between revisions of "1993 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Solution 2) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Solution 2 == | == Solution 2 == | ||
− | Let us assume the contrary. If <math>f(x)=p(x)q(x)</math>, then that is equivalent to <math>x^{n-1}(x+5)=p(x)q(x)-3</math>. Now we see that <math>p(0)q(0)=3</math> and <math>p(-5)q(-5)=3</math>. This implies that the constant terms of <math>p</math> and <math>q</math> are either <math>-1,-3</math> or <math>1,3</math>, up to permutation. Let <math>p(x)=a(x)+3</math> and <math>q(x)=b(x)+1</math>. The only possibility for <math>p(-5)q(-5)</math> to be equal to <math>3</math> is to make <math>a(-5)=b(-5)=0</math>. This is because if they are not zero they must be nonzero multiples of 5, and so <math>p(-5)q(-5)</math> must be larger than 3. So <math>p(x)-3=(x+5)A(x)</math> and <math>q(x)-1=(x+5)B(x)</math>. Now plug these back to <math>x^{n-1}(x+5)=p(x)q(x)-3</math> we see that <cmath>x^{n-1}(x+5)=[(x+5)A(x)+3][(x+5)B(x)+1]-3</cmath>. This is equivalent to <cmath>(x+5)^2A(x)B(x)+(x+5)A(x)+3(x+5)B(x)=(x+5)x^{n-1}</cmath>. One of <math>A(x)</math> and <math>B(x)</math> must be 0. But then that implies one of <math>p</math> and <math>q</math> is less than degree 1. So the assumption must be false. The <math>(-1,-3)</math> case is similar. | + | Let us assume the contrary. If <math>f(x)=p(x)q(x)</math>, then that is equivalent to <math>x^{n-1}(x+5)=p(x)q(x)-3</math>. Now we see that <math>p(0)q(0)=3</math> and <math>p(-5)q(-5)=3</math>. This implies that the constant terms of <math>p</math> and <math>q</math> are either <math>-1,-3</math> or <math>1,3</math>, up to permutation. Let <math>p(x)=a(x)+3</math> and <math>q(x)=b(x)+1</math>. The only possibility for <math>p(-5)q(-5)</math> to be equal to <math>3</math> is to make <math>a(-5)=b(-5)=0</math>. This is because if they are not zero they must be nonzero multiples of 5, and so <math>p(-5)q(-5)</math> must be larger than 3. So <math>p(x)-3=(x+5)A(x)</math> and <math>q(x)-1=(x+5)B(x)</math>. Now plug these back to <math>x^{n-1}(x+5)=p(x)q(x)-3</math> we see that <cmath>x^{n-1}(x+5)=[(x+5)A(x)+3][(x+5)B(x)+1]-3</cmath>. This is equivalent to <cmath>(x+5)^2A(x)B(x)+(x+5)A(x)+3(x+5)B(x)=(x+5)x^{n-1}</cmath>. One of <math>A(x)</math> and <math>B(x)</math> must be 0. But then that implies one of <math>p</math> and <math>q</math> is less than degree 1. So the assumption must be false. The <math>(-1,-3)</math> case is similar. |
+ | -by CreamyCream 123 | ||
==Alternate Solution== | ==Alternate Solution== |
Latest revision as of 22:24, 28 September 2025
Problem
Let , where
is an integer. Prove that
cannot be expressed as the product of two non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients.
Solution
For the sake of contradiction, assume that for polynomials
and
in
. Furthermore, let
with
if
and
with
if
. This gives that
.
We have that , or
. WLOG, let
(and thus
). Since
and
divides
but not
, we need that
. We can keep on going up the chain until we get that
. Then, by equating coefficients once more, we get that
. Taking the equation
gives that
. This implies that
. Thus, the degree of
is at least
. However, because
is a non-constant factor of
, we have that the degree of
is at most
. Thus, the degree of
is
, implying that the degree of
is
.
From this fact, we have that there must exist an integer root of . However, when
is an integer,
, meaning
is odd, so
cannot be a root of
.
Hence, cannot be expressed as
for polynomials
and
in
. This means that
cannot be expressed as the product of two non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients.
Q.E.D.
Solution 2
Let us assume the contrary. If , then that is equivalent to
. Now we see that
and
. This implies that the constant terms of
and
are either
or
, up to permutation. Let
and
. The only possibility for
to be equal to
is to make
. This is because if they are not zero they must be nonzero multiples of 5, and so
must be larger than 3. So
and
. Now plug these back to
we see that
. This is equivalent to
. One of
and
must be 0. But then that implies one of
and
is less than degree 1. So the assumption must be false. The
case is similar.
-by CreamyCream 123
Alternate Solution
It’s actually trivial by Perron’s Criterion lol
Note: Quoting Perron's Criterion on the actual IMO will very likely result in a score in the set , since it was not a well-known result back then.
See Also
1993 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |