Difference between revisions of "1986 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Durianaops (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<cmath>2d=m^2-n^2=(m+n)(m-n)</cmath> can be deduced. Since <math>m^2-n^2</math> is even, <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> have the same parity, so <math>(m+n)(m-n)</math> is divisible by <math>4</math>. It follows that the odd integer <math>d</math> must be divisible by <math>2</math>, leading to a contradiction. We are done. | <cmath>2d=m^2-n^2=(m+n)(m-n)</cmath> can be deduced. Since <math>m^2-n^2</math> is even, <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> have the same parity, so <math>(m+n)(m-n)</math> is divisible by <math>4</math>. It follows that the odd integer <math>d</math> must be divisible by <math>2</math>, leading to a contradiction. We are done. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Solution 3= | ||
| + | |||
| + | Suppose one can't find distinct a,b from the set <math>A=\{2,5,13,d\}</math> such that <math>ab-1</math> is a perfect square. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let,<math>2d-1=x^2\cdots (1)</math> | ||
| + | <math>5d-1=y^2\cdots (2)</math> | ||
| + | <math>13d-1 =z^2 \cdots (3)</math>.b | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clearly <math>Z^2+1 = 13d = 3(5d)-2d= 3y^2-x^2+2</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>\implies x^2 +z^2=3y^2+1</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clearly ,if <math>x^2,z^2</math> is 1 or 0 modulo 3 then it has no solution . | ||
| + | |||
| + | Suppose,<math>Z=3r</math> and <math>x=3</math>±<math>1</math>, | ||
| + | <math>\implies 3|z </math>, | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>\implies 9|z^2</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | So,<math> 5d-1 \equiv 0 \pmod{9}</math> and <math>13d-1 \equiv 0 \pmod{9}</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>\implies d \equiv 0 \pmod{d}</math>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is contradiction ! Since <math>9|5d-1</math>. | ||
| + | @ftheftics | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
{{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} | {{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} | ||
Revision as of 23:30, 20 January 2020
Problem
Let
be any positive integer not equal to
or
. Show that one can find distinct
in the set
such that
is not a perfect square.
Solution
Solution 1
We do casework with mods.
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
Therefore,
Now consider
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
As we have covered all possible cases, we are done.
Solution 2
Proof by contradiction:
Suppose
,
and
. From the first equation,
is an odd integer. Let
. We have
, which is an odd integer. Then
and
must be even integers, denoted by
and
respectively, and thus
, from which
can be deduced. Since
is even,
and
have the same parity, so
is divisible by
. It follows that the odd integer
must be divisible by
, leading to a contradiction. We are done.
Solution 3
Suppose one can't find distinct a,b from the set
such that
is a perfect square.
Let,
.b
Clearly
.
.
Clearly ,if
is 1 or 0 modulo 3 then it has no solution .
Suppose,
and
±
,
,
.
So,
and
.
.
It is contradiction ! Since
.
@ftheftics
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
| 1986 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
| Preceded by First Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
| All IMO Problems and Solutions | ||