Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"
m (spelling fixxxxx) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{delete|As said [https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c65h1815452_spam_page here], this is a spam page. Read that page to know why.}} | ||
| + | |||
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following: | The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following: | ||
Revision as of 06:47, 15 September 2020
|
This page has been proposed for deletion. Reason: As said here, this is a spam page. Read that page to know why. Note to sysops: Before deleting, please review: • What links here • Discussion page • Edit history |
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if 
and 
, 
, Sato is amazing.
Learn about Sato: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato
Back to Main Page: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
