Difference between revisions of "Laurent Series"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''Laurent series''' of a complex function <math>f(z)</math> is a representation of that function as a power series which includes terms of negative degree. It may be used to express complex functions in cases where a Taylor series expansion cannot be applied. It is named after French mathematician Pierre Alphonse Laurent in 1843. | + | The '''Laurent series''' of a complex function <math>f(z)</math> is a representation of that function as a power series which includes terms of negative degree. It may be used to express complex functions in cases where a Taylor series expansion cannot be applied. It is named after French mathematician Pierre Alphonse Laurent, who formulated this idea in 1843. |
==Creating the Laurent Series== | ==Creating the Laurent Series== | ||
Latest revision as of 21:02, 12 April 2022
The Laurent series of a complex function
is a representation of that function as a power series which includes terms of negative degree. It may be used to express complex functions in cases where a Taylor series expansion cannot be applied. It is named after French mathematician Pierre Alphonse Laurent, who formulated this idea in 1843.
Contents
Creating the Laurent Series
Let
such that
for
. In order to create the Laurent Series, we need to prove four main theorems.
The First Theorem
Suppose that
is holomorphic for
. Then
The proof is actually not terrible. Consider some complex valued function
such that
where this exists, and
. Then it follows that
is holomorphic for
. Hence,
Now, notice that
for all
. This means we get
Clearly we have
and
which means that
and
by a theorem. This implies the result
The Second Theorem
Suppose that the first theorem holds and let
for all
with
as long as
and
. We claim that
.Note that from before, we have

for
. Now, there must exist an
such that
for all
by a theorem, so we get the inequality
for each
once again. But notice: the right hand side is independent of
! So, because we already assumed that
we see that the sum

converges. Hence, the sum
converges uniformly on the contour
. This means we get
But we are not finished just yet! Also notice that
for each
. This gives

and rearrangement gives the desired
The Third Theorem (The Laurent Series Defined)
We define the term "a ring in a wider sense" to mean the following: the set of points between two concentric circles, a disk without its center, and the exterior of a circle not including
. Let
be a ring in the wider sense, with center
and let
be holomorphic on
. Then there are numbers
for each
such that for all
we have the series
.Choose any
such that the circle
and let
for every
. Choose some
, and let
,
,
and
denote the same stuff we used earlier. Then it follows that
for
of course. The theorem then follows immediately
The Fourth Theorem (Uniqueness of the Laurent Series)
Is such a series unique, however? It certainly should be, or else I would not be writing this all down here. Let
be a ring in the wider sense with center
of a circle
, and let

for every
. Then we must prove that
holds for every integer
. We have
To swap the integrand and the sum, we must note that

Now we can have the following deduction.
Crisis avoided! Sort of. We assumed that
and
converge uniformly on
. We can fix this! Let the radius of
(remember,
is a circle) be
. Then there exists some
such that
with
. It follows that the series

holds when
so we get

converges. We have to prove uniform convergence though, so back to work. Notice that this result above implies that there is some
such that
for
. Hence we get
for
and where
. Like before, the RHS is independent of
so we get

converges, which implies that

converges uniformly. Repeat the same process for
with appropriate tweaks. Now, we finish by noting that
when
or we have
when
. The result follows from
.This shows that the series is unique, done