Difference between revisions of "2016 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"
Lopkiloinm (talk | contribs) (→Solution 4) |
Lopkiloinm (talk | contribs) (→Solution 4) |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
is an integer. ~Lopkiloinm | is an integer. ~Lopkiloinm | ||
− | Note: This solution is not the same as the first solution that is only in the integers and not in an integer polynomial field—a distinction which allows us to use <math>d</math> as all integers between 1 and <math>n</math>—not forcing us to use the Legendre <math>p</math>-adic valuation but simply the multiplicity <math>1-q^d</math>. This is because <math>\mathbb{Z}[q]</math> is considered a graded algebra whereas <math>\mathbb{Z}</math> is a non-graded algebra. | + | Note: This solution is not the same as the first solution that is only in the integers and not in an integer polynomial field—a distinction which allows us to use <math>d</math> as all integers between 1 and <math>n</math>—not forcing us to use the Legendre <math>p</math>-adic valuation but simply the multiplicity of <math>1-q^d</math>. This is because <math>\mathbb{Z}[q]</math> is considered a graded algebra whereas <math>\mathbb{Z}</math> is a non-graded algebra. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{USAMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{USAMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Revision as of 00:29, 28 June 2025
Contents
Problem
Prove that for any positive integer
is an integer.
Solution 1
Define for all rational numbers
and primes
, where if
, then
, and
is the greatest power of
that divides
for integer
. Note that the expression(that we're trying to prove is an integer) is clearly rational, call it
.
, by Legendre. Clearly,
, and
, where
is the remainder function(we take out groups of
which are just permutations of numbers
to
until there are less than
left, then we have
distinct values, which the minimum sum is attained at
to
). Thus,
, as the term in each summand is a sum of floors also and is clearly an integer.
Solution 2 (Controversial)
Consider an grid, which is to be filled with the integers
through
such that the numbers in each row are in increasing order from left to right, and such that the numbers in each column are in increasing order from bottom to top. In other words, we are creating an
standard Young tableaux.
The Hook Length Formula is the source of the controversy, as it is very powerful and trivializes this problem. The Hook Length Formula states that the number of ways to create this standard Young tableaux (call this for convenience) is:
Now, we do some simple rearrangement:
This is exactly the expression given in the problem! Since the expression given in the problem equals the number of distinct
standard Young tableaux, it must be an integer, so we are done.
Solution 3 (Induction)
Define Clearly,
and
Then Lots of terms cancel, and we are left with
The numerator has
consecutive positive integers, so one of them must be divisible by
Also, there are
terms left,
of which are even. We can choose one of these to cancel out the
in the denominator. Therefore, the ratio between
and
is an integer. By our inductive hypothesis,
is an integer. Therefore,
is as well, and we are done.
Note: This is incorrect.
Solution 4
Throughout this proof we work in the polynomial ring .
For any positive integer
define the
-integer and the Gaussian factorial (also called
-factorial) by
Because each
is a polynomial of degree
with integer coefficients,
is a finite polynomial in
, and evaluating at
recovers the ordinary factorial:
We will form a product/quotient of such Gaussian factorials, show that the resulting expression lies in
, and finally plug in
to obtain the desired integer.
We want to prove that every factor appears with non–negative exponent in
so that
.
For any the Gaussian factorial factors as
Let
be the exponent of
in a polynomial
; then
Apply this to :
Rewrite the last two sums together:
For each the difference
is
precisely when a multiple of
lies in the interval
, and
otherwise.
As
runs from
to
, every multiple of
in
is counted at most once.
Hence the entire sum is at most
, so
Because every exponent is non–negative, the denominator in the earlier factorial ratio divides the numerator inside . Therefore
itself lies in
, and evaluating at
shows the original product
is an integer. ~Lopkiloinm
Note: This solution is not the same as the first solution that is only in the integers and not in an integer polynomial field—a distinction which allows us to use as all integers between 1 and
—not forcing us to use the Legendre
-adic valuation but simply the multiplicity of
. This is because
is considered a graded algebra whereas
is a non-graded algebra.
See also
2016 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |