Difference between revisions of "2011 AIME I Problems/Problem 15"
(→Solution 7 (Vieta's and quadratic formula)) |
(→Solution 4) |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
Let us first note the obvious that is derived from Vieta's formulas: <math>a+b+c=0, ab+bc+ac=-2011</math>. Now, due to the first equation, let us say that <math>a+b=-c</math>, meaning that <math>a,b>0</math> and <math>c<0</math>. Now, since both <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> are greater than 0, their absolute values are both equal to <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>, respectively. Since <math>c</math> is less than 0, it equals <math>-a-b</math>. Therefore, <math>|c|=|-a-b|=a+b</math>, meaning <math>|a|+|b|+|c|=2(a+b)</math>. We now apply Newton's sums to get that <math>a^2+b^2+ab=2011</math>,or <math>(a+b)^2-ab=2011</math>. Solving, we find that <math>49^2-390</math> satisfies this, meaning <math>a+b=49</math>, so <math>2(a+b)=\boxed{098}</math>. | Let us first note the obvious that is derived from Vieta's formulas: <math>a+b+c=0, ab+bc+ac=-2011</math>. Now, due to the first equation, let us say that <math>a+b=-c</math>, meaning that <math>a,b>0</math> and <math>c<0</math>. Now, since both <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> are greater than 0, their absolute values are both equal to <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>, respectively. Since <math>c</math> is less than 0, it equals <math>-a-b</math>. Therefore, <math>|c|=|-a-b|=a+b</math>, meaning <math>|a|+|b|+|c|=2(a+b)</math>. We now apply Newton's sums to get that <math>a^2+b^2+ab=2011</math>,or <math>(a+b)^2-ab=2011</math>. Solving, we find that <math>49^2-390</math> satisfies this, meaning <math>a+b=49</math>, so <math>2(a+b)=\boxed{098}</math>. | ||
− | ==Solution 4== | + | ==Solution 4 (Vieta's and quadratic formula)== |
− | + | From [[Vieta's Formulas]] we have <math>a + b + c = 0</math> and <math>a(b + c) + bc = -2011.</math> <math>b + c = -a \implies -a^2 + bc = -2011.</math> <math>a^2 = (b + c)^2 \implies bc + 2011 = (b + c)^2.</math> So now we have a simple looking two-variable quadratic equation. From here, we can solve for <math>c</math> in terms of <math>b</math> using the [[quadratic formula]] and see if we can do something with the discriminant. <math>bc + 2011 = b^2 + 2bc + c^2.</math> <math>c^2 + (b)c + (b^2 - 2011) = 0.</math> So <math>c = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{8044 - 3b^2}}{2}.</math> So <math>8044 - 3b^2</math> must be a perfect square. <math>8044</math> is around <math>89^2</math>, so we can start from here and work downwards. Immediately, we see that if <math>8044 - 3b^2 = 88^2, b = 10.</math> Will this work? If <math>b = 10,</math> then <math>c</math> can be <math>-49</math> or <math>39</math>. So we have two cases: | |
− | |||
− | + | '''Case 1:''' <math>c = -49</math> | |
− | <math> | + | <math>b + c = -39</math> and <math>bc = -490</math> |
− | <math> | + | <math>a(-39) - 490 = -2011 \implies a = -39.</math> But this doesn't satisfy the equation <math>a + b + c = 0,</math> so this case won't work. |
− | |||
− | + | '''Case 2:''' <math>c = 39</math> | |
− | + | <math>b + c = 49</math> and <math>bc = 390</math> | |
− | + | <math>a(49) + 390 = -2011 \implies a = -49.</math> This works! <math>a + b + c = 10 + 39 - 49 = 0.</math> | |
− | <math> | ||
− | + | So our answer is <math>10 + 39 + 49 = \boxed{98}.</math> | |
− | + | ~[[User:grogg007|grogg007]] | |
− | + | Side note: <math>8044 - 3b^2</math> actually has 6 valid solutions for b, which are <math>\pm 39, \pm 49,</math> and <math> \pm 10,</math> but we didn't have to go looking for other values because <math>10</math> worked. If you REALLY wanted to, you could bash until you found these solutions and then say <math>10, 39,</math> and <math>49</math> must be the three absolute values of our roots, but this isn't ideal, especially during a timed competition like AIME. | |
− | |||
− | |||
==Solution 5 (mod to help bash)== | ==Solution 5 (mod to help bash)== |
Revision as of 08:51, 11 July 2025
Contents
Problem
For some integer , the polynomial
has the three integer roots
,
, and
. Find
.
Solution 1
From Vieta's formulas, we know that , and
. Thus
. All three of
,
, and
are non-zero: say, if
, then
(which is not an integer).
, let
. If
, then
and if
, then
from the fact that
. We have
Thus
. We know that
,
have the same sign, so product
is always positive. So
.
Also, if we fix ,
is fixed, so
is maximized when
. Hence,
So
. Thus we have bounded
as
, i.e.
since
. Let's analyze
. Here is a table:
![]() | ![]() |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
We can tell we don't need to bother with ,
, So
won't work.
,
is not divisible by
,
, which is too small to get
.
,
is not divisible by
or
or
, we can clearly tell that
is too much.
Hence, ,
.
,
.
Answer:
Solution 2
Starting off like the previous solution, we know that , and
.
Therefore, .
Substituting, .
Factoring the perfect square, we get: or
.
Therefore, a sum () squared minus a product (
) gives
..
We can guess and check different ’s starting with
since
.
therefore
.
Since no factors of can sum to
(
being the largest sum), a + b cannot equal
.
making
.
and
so
cannot work either.
We can continue to do this until we reach .
making
.
, so one root is
and another is
. The roots sum to zero, so the last root must be
.
.
Solution 3
Let us first note the obvious that is derived from Vieta's formulas: . Now, due to the first equation, let us say that
, meaning that
and
. Now, since both
and
are greater than 0, their absolute values are both equal to
and
, respectively. Since
is less than 0, it equals
. Therefore,
, meaning
. We now apply Newton's sums to get that
,or
. Solving, we find that
satisfies this, meaning
, so
.
Solution 4 (Vieta's and quadratic formula)
From Vieta's Formulas we have and
So now we have a simple looking two-variable quadratic equation. From here, we can solve for
in terms of
using the quadratic formula and see if we can do something with the discriminant.
So
So
must be a perfect square.
is around
, so we can start from here and work downwards. Immediately, we see that if
Will this work? If
then
can be
or
. So we have two cases:
Case 1:
and
But this doesn't satisfy the equation
so this case won't work.
Case 2:
and
This works!
So our answer is
Side note: actually has 6 valid solutions for b, which are
and
but we didn't have to go looking for other values because
worked. If you REALLY wanted to, you could bash until you found these solutions and then say
and
must be the three absolute values of our roots, but this isn't ideal, especially during a timed competition like AIME.
Solution 5 (mod to help bash)
First, derive the equations and
. Since the product is negative,
is negative, and
and
positive. Now, a simple mod 3 testing of all cases shows that
, and
has the repective value. We can choose
not congruent to 0, make sure you see why. Now, we bash on values of
, testing the quadratic function to see if
is positive. You can also use a delta argument like solution 4, but this is simpler. We get that for
,
. Choosing
positive we get
, so
~firebolt360
Solution 6
Note that , so
, or
. Also,
, so
. Substituting
, we can obtain
, or
. If it is not known that
is prime, it may be proved in
minutes or so by checking all primes up to
. If
divided either of
, then in order for
to contain an extra copy of
, both
would need to be divisible by
. But then
would also be divisible by
, and the sum
would clearly be divisible by
.
By LTE, if
is divisible by
and neither
are divisible by
. Thus, the only possibility remaining is if
did not divide
. Let
. Then, we have
. Rearranging gives
. As in the above solutions, we may eliminate certain values of
by using mods. Then, we may test values until we obtain
, and
. Thus,
,
, and our answer is
.
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNbfAu5rdJI&t=26s ~ MathEx
See also
2011 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 14 |
Followed by Last Problem | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.