Difference between revisions of "1984 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Solution 3) |
(→Solution 3) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Equating the coefficients of <math>x^3</math> and <math>x</math> with their known values, we are left with essentially the same linear equations as in Solution #1, which we solve in the same way. Then we compute the coefficient of <math>x^2</math> and get <math>k=\boxed{86}.</math> | Equating the coefficients of <math>x^3</math> and <math>x</math> with their known values, we are left with essentially the same linear equations as in Solution #1, which we solve in the same way. Then we compute the coefficient of <math>x^2</math> and get <math>k=\boxed{86}.</math> | ||
− | == Solution 3 == | + | == Solution 3 AM-GM== |
− | Let the roots of the | + | Let <math>r_1, r_2, r_3, r_4</math> be the roots of the polynomial <math>x^4 - 18x^3 + kx^2 + 200x - 1984 = 0</math>. We are given that <math>r_1 r_2 = -32</math>. By Vieta's formulas, we have: \begin{align*} \label{eq:1} r_1+r_2+r_3+r_4 &= 18 \ r_1r_2+r_1r_3+r_1r_4+r_2r_3+r_2r_4+r_3r_4 &= k \ r_1r_2r_3+r_1r_2r_4+r_1r_3r_4+r_2r_3r_4 &= -200 \ r_1r_2r_3r_4 &= -1984\end{align*} Since <math>r_1r_2 = -32</math>, we have <math>(-32)r_3r_4 = -1984</math>, so <math>r_3r_4 = \frac{-1984}{-32} = 62</math>. Also, <math>r_1r_2r_3+r_1r_2r_4+r_1r_3r_4+r_2r_3r_4 = -200</math>, so <math>r_1r_2(r_3+r_4)+r_3r_4(r_1+r_2) = -200</math>. Substituting <math>r_1r_2 = -32</math> and <math>r_3r_4 = 62</math>, we have <math>-32(r_3+r_4)+62(r_1+r_2) = -200</math>. Let <math>A = r_1+r_2</math> and <math>B = r_3+r_4</math>. Then <math>A+B = 18</math>, so <math>B = 18-A</math>. Substituting this into the equation, we have <math>-32B+62A = -200</math>, so <math>-32(18-A)+62A = -200</math>. <math>-576+32A+62A = -200</math>, so <math>94A = 376</math>, which means <math>A = \frac{376}{94} = 4</math>. Then <math>B = 18-A = 18-4 = 14</math>. So we have <math>r_1+r_2 = 4</math> and <math>r_1r_2 = -32</math>. Then <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_2</math> are roots of <math>x^2-4x-32 = 0</math>, so <math>(x-8)(x+4) = 0</math>, which means <math>r_1 = 8</math> and <math>r_2 = -4</math> (or vice versa). Also we have <math>r_3+r_4 = 14</math> and <math>r_3r_4 = 62</math>. Then <math>r_3</math> and <math>r_4</math> are roots of <math>x^2-14x+62 = 0</math>. Using the quadratic formula, <math>x = \frac{14 \pm \sqrt{14^2-4(62)}}{2} = \frac{14 \pm \sqrt{196-248}}{2} = \frac{14 \pm \sqrt{-52}}{2} = 7 \pm i\sqrt{13}</math>. Then <math>r_3 = 7+i\sqrt{13}</math> and <math>r_4 = 7-i\sqrt{13}</math>. We want to find <math>k = r_1r_2+r_1r_3+r_1r_4+r_2r_3+r_2r_4+r_3r_4</math>. <math>k = r_1r_2+r_3r_4 + (r_1+r_2)(r_3+r_4) = -32+62+(4)(14) = 30+56 = 86</math>. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | \end{align*} | ||
− | Since <math> | ||
− | ~ | + | Then <math>k = \sum_{i < j} r_i r_j = r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 + r_1r_4 + r_2r_3 + r_2r_4 + r_3r_4 = r_1r_2 + r_3r_4 + (r_1+r_2)(r_3+r_4) = -32+62+(4)(14) = 30+56 = 86</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | ~ avm2023 | ||
== Solution 4 (Alcumus)== | == Solution 4 (Alcumus)== |
Revision as of 15:46, 28 July 2025
Contents
Problem
In the polynomial , the product of
of its roots is
. Find
.
Solution 1 (ingenious)
Using Vieta's formulas, we have:
From the last of these equations, we see that . Thus, the second equation becomes
, and so
. The key insight is now to factor the left-hand side as a product of two binomials:
, so that we now only need to determine
and
rather than all four of
.
Let and
. Plugging our known values for
and
into the third Vieta equation,
, we have
. Moreover, the first Vieta equation,
, gives
. Thus we have two linear equations in
and
, which we solve to obtain
and
.
Therefore, we have , yielding
.
Solution 2 (cool)
We start as before: and
. We now observe that a and b must be the roots of a quadratic,
, where r is a constant (secretly, r is just -(a+b)=-p from Solution #1). Similarly, c and d must be the roots of a quadratic
.
Now
Equating the coefficients of and
with their known values, we are left with essentially the same linear equations as in Solution #1, which we solve in the same way. Then we compute the coefficient of
and get
Solution 3 AM-GM
Let be the roots of the polynomial
. We are given that
. By Vieta's formulas, we have: \begin{align*} \label{eq:1} r_1+r_2+r_3+r_4 &= 18 \ r_1r_2+r_1r_3+r_1r_4+r_2r_3+r_2r_4+r_3r_4 &= k \ r_1r_2r_3+r_1r_2r_4+r_1r_3r_4+r_2r_3r_4 &= -200 \ r_1r_2r_3r_4 &= -1984\end{align*} Since
, we have
, so
. Also,
, so
. Substituting
and
, we have
. Let
and
. Then
, so
. Substituting this into the equation, we have
, so
.
, so
, which means
. Then
. So we have
and
. Then
and
are roots of
, so
, which means
and
(or vice versa). Also we have
and
. Then
and
are roots of
. Using the quadratic formula,
. Then
and
. We want to find
.
.
Then .
~ avm2023
Solution 4 (Alcumus)
Since two of the roots have product the equation can be factored in the form
Expanding, we get
Matching coefficients, we get
\begin{align*}
a + b &= -18, \\
ab + c - 32 &= k, \\
ac - 32b &= 200, \\
-32c &= -1984.
\end{align*}Then
so
With
we can solve to find
and
Then
Video Solution by Omega Learn
https://youtu.be/Dp-pw6NNKRo?t=316
~ pi_is_3.14
See Also
1984 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by First Problem |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.