Difference between revisions of "2023 AIME I Problems/Problem 12"
(→Solution 7) |
(→Solution 8(coordinates bash again!)) |
||
Line 385: | Line 385: | ||
We have <math>3</math> equations with <math>3</math> variables and since we are trying to find <math>\tan(\theta)^{2}</math>, we can treat <math>\tan(\theta)</math> as a variable. We solve to get <math>\tan(\theta) = 5\sqrt{3}</math> and therefore our answer is just <math>\boxed{075}</math>. | We have <math>3</math> equations with <math>3</math> variables and since we are trying to find <math>\tan(\theta)^{2}</math>, we can treat <math>\tan(\theta)</math> as a variable. We solve to get <math>\tan(\theta) = 5\sqrt{3}</math> and therefore our answer is just <math>\boxed{075}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Note: How to solve the system of equations== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first step is to realize that we need to make the inputs nicer. So we clear the fractions and set them equal. Doing so, we have: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{a\sqrt{3} - b}{a + b\sqrt{3} - 30} = \frac{a\sqrt{3} + b - 55\sqrt{3}}{-a + b\sqrt{3} - 5} = \frac{b}{7 - a}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now we can write: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{a\sqrt{3} - b}{a + b\sqrt{3} - 30} = \frac{b}{7 - a}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{a\sqrt{3} + b - 55\sqrt{3}}{-a + b\sqrt{3} - 5} = \frac{b}{7 - a}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here, we're going to change <math>a</math> to <math>x</math> and <math>b</math> to <math>y</math> just to make the solving more traditional. We can cross multiply the first equation and simplify to get | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>7x\sqrt{3} - x^{2} \sqrt{3} = y^{2} \sqrt{3} - 23y</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Next, we cross multiply the second equation to get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>7x\sqrt{3} - x^{2} \sqrt{3} + 7y - xy - 385\sqrt{3} + 55x\sqrt{3} = -xy + y^{2} \sqrt{3} - 5y</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice we could make some substitutions from our first equation to the second equation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>y^{2} \sqrt{3} - 23y + 7y - 385\sqrt{3} + 55x\sqrt{3} = y^{2} \sqrt{3} - 5y</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We simplify this to get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>-16y - 385\sqrt{3} + 55x\sqrt{3} = -5y</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This means: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>55x\sqrt{3} - 385\sqrt{3} = 11y</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Which yields: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>y = 5\sqrt{3}(x - 7)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, we plug this representation into the equation <math>7x\sqrt{3} - x^{2} \sqrt{3} = y^{2} \sqrt{3} - 23y</math> we got earlier to get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>7x\sqrt{3} - x^{2} \sqrt{3} = 75\sqrt{3} (x - 7)^{2} - 115x\sqrt{3} + 805\sqrt{3}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can expand and simplify to get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>122x\sqrt{3} - x^{2} \sqrt{2} = 75x^{2} \sqrt{3} - 1050x\sqrt{3} + 4480\sqrt{3}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Simplifying, we get: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>76x^{2} \sqrt{3} - 1172x\sqrt{3} + 4480\sqrt{3} = 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This yields: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>19x^{2} - 293x + 1120 = 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now this is trivial to solve: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>x = \frac{293 \pm \sqrt{293^{2} - 76\cdot1120}}{38}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find <math>293^{2}</math> really quickly under contest conditions, we can do: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>293^{2} = (200 + 93)^{2} = 200^{2} + 400\cdot93 + (90 + 3)^{2} = 40000 + 37200 + 8100 + 549 = 85849</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now back to simplifying <math>x</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The discriminant nicely simplifies to <math>85849 - 85120 = 729 = 27^{2}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | So we have <math>x = \frac{293 + 27}{38} = \frac{320}{38} = \frac{160}{19}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | And now we're basically done. Recall that <math>y = 5x\sqrt{3} - 35\sqrt{3} = \frac{5\sqrt{3}\cdot160}{19} - \frac{35\sqrt{3}\cdot19}{19} = \frac{135\sqrt{3}}{19}</math>. Now recall that we let <math>a = x</math> and <math>b = y</math> so we now have <math>a = \frac{160}{19}</math> and <math>b = \frac{135\sqrt{3}}{19}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, recall that <math>\tan(\theta) = \mid \frac{b}{7 - a} \mid = \mid \frac{\frac{135\sqrt{3}}{19}}{7 - \frac{160}{19}} \mid = \mid \frac{\frac{135\sqrt{3}}{19}}{\frac{133 - 160}{19}} \mid = \mid \frac{135\sqrt{3}}{-27} \mid = \mid -5\sqrt{3} \mid = 5\sqrt{3}</math> as desired. | ||
~ilikemath247365 | ~ilikemath247365 |
Revision as of 20:49, 1 August 2025
Contents
- 1 Problem
- 2 Diagram
- 3 Solution 1 (Coordinates Bash)
- 4 Solution 2 (Vectors/Complex)
- 5 Solution 3 (Synthetic)
- 6 Solution 4 (Law of Cosines)
- 7 Solution 5 (Combining Solutions 3 and 4)
- 8 Solution 6
- 9 Solution 7
- 10 Solution 8(coordinates bash again!)
- 11 Note: How to solve the system of equations
- 12 Video Solution
- 13 Animated Video Solution
- 14 Video Solution by MOP 2024
- 15 See also
Problem
Let be an equilateral triangle with side length
Points
and
lie on
and
respectively, with
and
Point
inside
has the property that
Find
Diagram
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 1 (Coordinates Bash)
By Miquel's theorem, (intersection of circles)
. The law of cosines can be used to compute
,
, and
. Toss the points on the coordinate plane; let
,
, and
, where we will find
with
.
By the extended law of sines, the radius of circle is
. Its center lies on the line
, and the origin is a point on it, so
.
The radius of circle is
. The origin is also a point on it, and its center is on the line
, so
.
The equations of the two circles are These equations simplify to
Subtracting these two equations gives that both their points of intersection,
and
, lie on the line
. Hence,
. To scale, the configuration looks like the figure below:
Basic angle chasing gives
Because
which means that
is cyclic, and that
passes through the circumcircle of triangle
Similar reasoning leads us to the fact that
also passes through the circumcircles of triangles
and
which means that
Continue as above.
Solution 2 (Vectors/Complex)
Denote .
In , we have
.
Thus,
Taking the real and imaginary parts, we get
In , analogous to the analysis of
above, we get
Taking , we get
Taking , we get
Taking , we get
Therefore,
Therefore, .
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
Solution 3 (Synthetic)
Drop the perpendiculars from to
,
,
, and call them
and
respectively. This gives us three similar right triangles
,
, and
The sum of the perpendiculars to a point within an equilateral triangle is always constant, so we have that
The sum of the lengths of the alternating segments split by the perpendiculars from a point within an equilateral triangle is always equal to half the perimeter, so
which means that
Finally,
Thus,
~anon
Claim
a) Carnot's theorem. Given triangle and point
Let
doesn't have to be inside
Prove that
b) Let be the equilateral triangle. Prove that
(The sum of the lengths of the alternating segments split by the perpendiculars from a point
within an equilateral triangle is equal to half the perimeter.)
Proof
a)
b)
vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss
Solution 4 (Law of Cosines)
This solution is inspired by AIME 1999 Problem 14 Solution 2 (a similar question)
Draw line segments from to points
,
, and
. And label the angle measure of
,
, and
to be
Using Law of Cosines (note that )
We can perform this operation :
Leaving us with (after combining and simplifying)
Therefore, we want to solve for
Notice that
We can use Law of Cosines again to solve for the sides of , which have side lengths of
,
, and
, and area
.
Label the lengths of ,
, and
to be
,
, and
.
Therefore, using the area formula,
In addition, we know that
By using Law of Cosines for ,
, and
respectively
Because we want , which is
, we see that
So plugging the results back into the equation before, we get
Giving us
Solution 5 (Combining Solutions 3 and 4)
We begin by using the fact stated in Solution 3 that, for any point in an equilateral triangle, the lengths of the three perpendicular lines dropped to the sides of the triangle add up to the altitude of that triangle. To make things simple, let's assign . We can label these three perpendiculars as:
Simplifying, we get
Now, as stated and quoting Solution 4,
"Draw line segments from
to points
,
, and
. [We know that] the angle measure of
,
, and
is
Using Law of Cosines (note that )
We can perform this operation :
Leaving us with (after combining and simplifying)
".
Now, we can use our previous equation along with this one to get:
.
This equation becomes:
As so, our answer is
~Solution by armang32324 (Mathemagics Club)
Solution 6
By the law of cosines,
Similarly we get
and
.
implies that
,
, and
are three cyclic quadrilaterals, as shown below:
Using the law of sines in each,
So we can set
,
, and
. Let
,
, and
. Applying Ptolemy theorem in the cyclic quadrilaterals,
We can solve out
,
,
. By the law of cosines in
,
. The law of sines yield
.
Lastly,
, then
. The answer is
Solution 7
is well known to be the Miquel point of triangle
. By Law of Cosines,
,
,
. Call
,
,
:
,
,
respectively. Then we obtain that
,
,
. Note that since the area of the triangle by sine area formula is
, but by Heron's formula, the area of the triangle is
.
, and so we obtain
by adding all the equations together. Now, subtract any two equations from each other to obtain
,
,
,
, and
,
, and
. Now we find PC through Ptolemy's theorem, do Law of Cosines, and we are finished.
Solution 8(coordinates bash again!)
Recall that if is the angle between two lines with slopes
, we can write:
We will use this fact to solve the problem. Let be at the origin,
be at
and
be at
. Next, we can easily find the equation of line
as
and the equation of line
as
. We also know that
is at
given the problem's conditions. We can now find the coordinates of
and
. To find the coordinates of
, recall that
lies on line segment
which has equation
. Hence,
will be a point of the form
. We also know the distance between
and
(the origin), is just
. So the distance between the point
and
is just
. We can use the distance formula to get a solution of
(there will be two solutions but one of them is unfeasible). So the coordinates of
is just
. Similarly, we can find the coordinates of
in a similar way to get
. Note that
. Let's focus on
. This angle is between lines
and
so we just have to compute the slopes of these lines. Let
be at point
. Then, the slope of
is just
and the slope of
is just
. Because the angle between these two lines is
, we can use our above lemma to get the equation:
We can similarly use the other angles and lines to come up with two more of these type of equations:
We have equations with
variables and since we are trying to find
, we can treat
as a variable. We solve to get
and therefore our answer is just
.
Note: How to solve the system of equations
The first step is to realize that we need to make the inputs nicer. So we clear the fractions and set them equal. Doing so, we have:
.
Now we can write:
Here, we're going to change to
and
to
just to make the solving more traditional. We can cross multiply the first equation and simplify to get
Next, we cross multiply the second equation to get:
Notice we could make some substitutions from our first equation to the second equation:
We simplify this to get:
This means:
Which yields:
Now, we plug this representation into the equation we got earlier to get:
We can expand and simplify to get:
Simplifying, we get:
This yields:
Now this is trivial to solve:
To find really quickly under contest conditions, we can do:
Now back to simplifying :
The discriminant nicely simplifies to
So we have .
And now we're basically done. Recall that . Now recall that we let
and
so we now have
and
.
Now, recall that as desired.
~ilikemath247365
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdwM8GpY_yc
~MathProblemSolvingSkills.com
Animated Video Solution
~Star League (https://starleague.us)
Video Solution by MOP 2024
See also
2023 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 11 |
Followed by Problem 13 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.