Difference between revisions of "2001 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution 1) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<asy> | <asy> | ||
− | pathpen = linewidth(0.7); size(300); pen d = linetype("4 4") + linewidth(0.6); pair B=(0,0), C=(10,0), A=7*expi(1),O=D(incenter(A,B,C)),D1 = D(MP("D_1",foot(O,B,C))),E1 = D(MP("E_1",foot(O,A,C),NE)),E2 = D(MP("E_2",C+A-E1,NE)); /* arbitrary points */ /* ugly construction for OA */ pair Ca = 2C-A, Cb = bisectorpoint(Ca,C,B), OA = IP(A--A+10*(O-A),C--C+50*(Cb-C)), D2 = D(MP("D_2",foot(OA,B,C))), Fa=2B-A, Ga=2C-A, F=MP("F",D(foot(OA,B,Fa)),NW), G=MP("G",D(foot(OA,C,Ga)),NE); D(OA); D(MP("A",A,N)--MP("B",B,NW)--MP("C",C,NE)--cycle); D(incircle(A,B,C)); D(CP(OA,D2),d); D(B--Fa,linewidth(0.6)); D(C--Ga,linewidth(0.6)); D(MP("P",IP(D(A--D2),D(B--E2)),NNE)); D(MP("Q",IP(incircle(A,B,C),A--D2),SW)); clip((-20,-10)--(-20,20)--(20,20)--(20,-10)--cycle); </asy> | + | pathpen = linewidth(0.7); size(300); pen d = linetype("4 4") + linewidth(0.6); pair B=(0,0), C=(10,0), A=7*expi(1),O=D(incenter(A,B,C)),D1 = D(MP("D_1",foot(O,B,C))),E1 = D(MP("E_1",foot(O,A,C),NE)),E2 = D(MP("E_2",C+A-E1,NE)); /* arbitrary points */ /* ugly construction for OA */ pair Ca = 2C-A, Cb = bisectorpoint(Ca,C,B), OA = IP(A--A+10*(O-A),C--C+50*(Cb-C)), D2 = D(MP("D_2",foot(OA,B,C))), Fa=2B-A, Ga=2C-A, F=MP("F",D(foot(OA,B,Fa)),NW), G=MP("G",D(foot(OA,C,Ga)),NE); D(OA); D(MP("A",A,N)--MP("B",B,NW)--MP("C",C,NE)--cycle); D(incircle(A,B,C)); D(CP(OA,D2),d); D(B--Fa,linewidth(0.6)); D(C--Ga,linewidth(0.6)); D(MP("P",IP(D(A--D2),D(B--E2)),NNE)); D(MP("Q",IP(incircle(A,B,C),A--D2),SW)); clip((-20,-10)--(-20,20)--(20,20)--(20,-10)--cycle); |
− | By Menelaus' Theorem on <math>\triangle ACD_2</math> with segment <math>\overline{BE_2}</math>, it follows that <math>\frac{CE_2}{E_2A} \cdot \frac{AP}{PD_2} \cdot \frac{BD_2}{BC} = 1 \Longrightarrow \frac{AP}{PD_2} = \frac{( | + | </asy> |
+ | |||
+ | By Menelaus' Theorem on <math>\triangle ACD_2</math> with segment <math>\overline{BE_2}</math>, it follows that <math>\frac{CE_2}{E_2A} \cdot \frac{AP}{PD_2} \cdot \frac{BD_2}{BC} = 1 \Longrightarrow \frac{AP}{PD_2} = \frac{(b - (s-a)) \cdot a}{(a-(s-b)) \cdot AE_1} = \frac{a}{s-a}</math>. It easily follows that <math>AQ = D_2P</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
===Solution 2=== | ===Solution 2=== |
Latest revision as of 07:52, 22 September 2025
Contents
Problem
Let be a triangle and let
be its incircle. Denote by
and
the points where
is tangent to sides
and
, respectively. Denote by
and
the points on sides
and
, respectively, such that
and
, and denote by
the point of intersection of segments
and
. Circle
intersects segment
at two points, the closer of which to the vertex
is denoted by
. Prove that
.
Solution
Solution 1
It is well known that the excircle opposite is tangent to
at the point
. (Proof: let the points of tangency of the excircle with the lines
be
respectively. Then
. It follows that
, and
, so
.)
Now consider the homothety that carries the incircle of to its excircle. The homothety also carries
to
(since
are collinear), and carries the tangency points
to
. It follows that
.
By Menelaus' Theorem on with segment
, it follows that
. It easily follows that
.
Solution 2
The key observation is the following lemma.
Lemma: Segment is a diameter of circle
.
Proof: Let be the center of circle
, i.e.,
is the incenter of triangle
. Extend segment
through
to intersect circle
again at
, and extend segment
through
to intersect segment
at
. We show that
, which in turn implies that
, that is,
is a diameter of
.
Let be the line tangent to circle
at
, and let
intersect the segments
and
at
and
, respectively. Then
is an excircle of triangle
. Let
denote the dilation with its center at
and ratio
. Since
and
,
. Hence
. Thus
,
, and
. It also follows that an excircle
of triangle
is tangent to the side
at
.
It is well known that We compute
. Let
and
denote the points of tangency of circle
with rays
and
, respectively. Then by equal tangents,
,
, and
. Hence
It follows that
Combining these two equations yields
. Thus
that is,
, as desired.
Now we prove our main result. Let and
be the respective midpoints of segments
and
. Then
is also the midpoint of segment
, from which it follows that
is the midline of triangle
. Hence
and
. Similarly, we can prove that
.
2001usamo2-2.png
Let be the centroid of triangle
. Thus segments
and
intersect at
. Define transformation
as the dilation with its center at
and ratio
. Then
and
. Under the dilation, parallel lines go to parallel lines and the intersection of two lines goes to the intersection of their images. Since
and
,
maps lines
and
to lines
and
, respectively. It also follows that
and
or
This yields
as desired.
Note: We used directed lengths in our calculations to avoid possible complications caused by the different shapes of triangle .
Solution 3
Here is a rather nice solution using barycentric coordinates:
Let be
,
be
, and
be
. Let the side lengths of the triangle be
and the semi-perimeter
.
Now, Thus,
Therefore, and
Clearly then, the non-normalized coordinates of
Normalizing, we have that
Now, we find the point inside the triangle on the line
such that
. It is then sufficient to show that this point lies on the incircle.
is the fraction
of the way "up" the line segment from
to
. Thus, we are looking for the point that is
of the way "down" the line segment from
to
, or, the fraction
of the way "up".
Thus, has normalized
-coordinate
.
As the line has equation
, it can easily be found that
Recalling that the equation of the incircle is We must show that this equation is true for
's values of
.
Plugging in our values, this means showing that
Dividing by
, this is just
Plugging in the value of
The first bracket is just
and the second bracket is
Dividing everything by
gives
which is
, as desired.
As lies on the incircle and
,
, and our proof is complete.
Solution 4
We again use Barycentric coordinates. As before, let be
,
be
, and
be
. Also
Now, consider a point for which
. Then working component-vise, we get
from which we can easily get the coordinates of
as;
It suffices to show that .
Let be the incenter of triangle
. We claim that
is the midpoint of
. Indeed,
Hence the claim has been proved.
Since is the center of
and the midpoint of
, thus
is the point diametrically opposite to
, and hence it lies on
and closer to
off the 2 points. Thus
as desired.
See also
2001 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions.