Difference between revisions of "Divisibility rules/Rule for 29 proof"

Latest revision as of 19:27, 6 March 2014

If $k=d_110^0+d_210^1+d_310^2+...$ , we can say that $k+3d_0\equiv 30k+3d_0\equiv 10k+d_0$ , which is our original number.

Revision as of 03:21, 16 February 2012 (view source) Khayyam-guilan (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "If <math>k=d_110^0+d_210^1+d_310^2+...</math>, we can say that <math>k+3d_0\equiv 30k+3d_0\equiv 10k+d_0</math>, which is our original number. [[Divisibility rules \| Back to Di...")		Latest revision as of 19:27, 6 March 2014 (view source) Greenpepper9999 (talk \| contribs) (Added category)
Line 3:		Line 3:

	[[Divisibility rules \| Back to Divisibility Rules]]		[[Divisibility rules \| Back to Divisibility Rules]]
		+	[[Category:Divisibility Rules]]