1967 IMO Problems/Problem 2
Prove that if one and only one edge of a tetrahedron is greater than ,
then its volume is
.
Solution
Assume and let
. Let
be the feet of perpendicular from
to
and
and from
to
, respectively.
Suppose . We have that
,
. We also have
. So the volume of the tetrahedron is
.
We want to prove that this value is at most , which is equivalent to
. This is true because
.
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by jgnr. The original thread can be found here: [1]
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
The solution above is essentially correct, and it is nice, but it is so sloppily written that it borders the incomprehensible. Below I will give an edited version of it for the sake of completeness.
Then, I will give a second solution to the problem.
A few notes which may be of interest.
The condition that one side is greater than is not really
necessary. The statement is true even if all sides are
.
What we need is that no more than one side is
.
The upper limit of for the volume of the tetrahedron
is actually reached. This will become clear from both solutions.
Solution
Assume and assume that all other sides are
.
Let
. Let
be the feet of perpendiculars from
to
, from
to the plane
, and from
to
,
respectively.
At least one of the segments has to be
.
Suppose
. (If
were bigger that
the argument would be the same.) We have that
. By the same
argument in
we have
.
Since
plane
, we have
, so
.
The volume of the tetrahedron is
area of
height from
.
We need to prove that .
Some simple computations show that this is the same as
.
This is true because
, and
on this interval.
Note: is achieved when
and all inequalities
are equalities. This is the case when all sides except
are
,
are midpoints of
and
(in which case the planes
are perpendicular). In this case,
,
as can be seen from an easy computation.
Solution 2
We begin with a simple observation. Let be a tetrahedron, and
consider the transformations which rotate
around
as an axis while keeping
fixed. (The lengths of all
sides except
are constant through this transformation.)
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
TO BE CONTINUED. DOING A SAVE MIDWAY SO I DON'T LOOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.
See Also
1967 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |