1974 IMO Problems/Problem 3
Problem
Prove that the number
is not divisible by
for any integer
Solution
Everything that follows takes place in
, i.e. the field we get by adjoining a root of
to
, the field with
elements.
We have
. Now, this is zero iff it's zero when we multiply it by
, so we may as well prove that
. The LHS is
from
. We have
, so by multiplying them we get
. If we were to have
, then we would get
, and this is impossible, since it would make
a square
in
(i.e.
would be a quadratic residue modulo
, and it's not).
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by grobber.
Remarks (added by pf02, October 2025)
1. On the discussion page https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h58616 there are several variations of this solution, as well as solutions which can be called different from this one. It is worth looking at them.
2. As of today, the AI engines Gemini (from Google) and ChatGPT give correct solutions to this problem. The two solutions are essentially the same, and they are the same as one of the solutions from the discussion page. The prompt I gave to the AI engines was `prove that sum from k=0 to k=n of ("2n+1 choose 2k+1" * 2^(3k)) is not divisible by 5 for any n \ge 0'.
The original thread for this problem can be found here: [1]
See Also
| 1974 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
| Preceded by Problem 2 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 4 |
| All IMO Problems and Solutions | ||