1987 OIM Problems/Problem 4
Problem
We define the sequence as follows:
, and for all
,
is the greatest prime divisor of the expression:
Prove that
.
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
~additional modifications by eevee9406
Solution
We get from the definition; thus for all
, we must have
. But if we assume for the sake of contradiction that there exists
such that
, then
for some positive integer
because
is the minimal prime divisor of
since
and
are not prime divisors, but
must be the maximal prime divisor by definition. However, taking mod
reveals that the LHS is divisible by
but not
whereas the RHS is divisible by
, a contradiction.